Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control & RKBA

In reply to the discussion: can anyone verify this? [View all]

gejohnston

(17,502 posts)
2. apparently, the Home Office doesn't
Sun Oct 18, 2015, 04:01 PM
Oct 2015

report it, hence my reference to Jack. However the death register would might list them as "death by assault", or "violent deaths of interest to the police" by a corner's inquest but not defined as murder by the Home Office.

Kind of like the Japanese counting the murdered victims of murder/suicides as involuntary suicides.

Does seem ridiculous on its face, but truth is often stranger than fiction. That is why I ask.
When someone defends John Lott's hypothesis using UK as an example, I'm sure someone will mention this.
But this includes only England and Wales, not UK as a whole. What does Scotland and ULSTER do?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

can anyone verify this? [View all] gejohnston Oct 2015 OP
How do they count murders with no suspect? krispos42 Oct 2015 #1
apparently, the Home Office doesn't gejohnston Oct 2015 #2
That subject has long been verified. Kang Colby Oct 2015 #3
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»can anyone verify this?»Reply #2