Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

limpyhobbler

(8,244 posts)
6. Ok I'm no expert but
Sat Apr 21, 2012, 12:54 AM
Apr 2012

I think that classical liberal economics envisions that laissez-faire commerce is good for everybody, including the poor. I think we're talking probably Adam Smith, John Stuart Mill, and others in that era.

And we had a chance to see their theories play out to see how accurate they were, as the US and British economies were largely unregulated in the 1800s. The result was the extreme inequality, growth of industrial monopolies, abuse of workers, and all that stuff.

The sad thing is that the theories taught in economics classes in US schools is still based largely on those same principles that have been largely proven wrong by history.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»World History»In the late 18th century ...»Reply #6