Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

progree

(12,099 posts)
3. Thanks for the complements. I'm glad it went over well
Wed Mar 27, 2013, 04:12 AM
Mar 2013

Too many groups -- in my experience and from what I hear on email lists -- think there are lots of additional requirements, akin to boot camp.

I was set off by reading in the MIRUS (The Minneapolis AA Intergroup's Newsletter) a reposting of some Grapevine article that said:

"All of us know members who suffered from both alcoholism and drug addiction. These people have always been welcome as long as Alcohol is the primary problem."
{{emphasis mine}}

I wrote them one heck of an email suggesting they take a look at Tradition 3 again. Tradition 3 is not some starting point for groups adding additional requirements. It doesn't say "Tradition 3 - One of our requirements is a desire to stop drinking". I never got a response back.

On the dual-addicted, by the way, I read something on the wall of one of the Alano clubs a letter from GSO or somesuch that the dual-addicted are welcome as A.A. members (so long as they have a desire to stop drinking), but to keep the focus on alcohol in our shares. I have no problem with that, given the Primary Purpose and that the organization is named ALCOHOLICS Anonymous.

(I hope I'm not setting off a controversy, I really don't mean too).

Thanks for the 3/26/13 email, Stuart, very much appreciated.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Support Forums»Addiction & Recovery»The ONLY Requirement (you...»Reply #3