Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Adriennecliona

(2 posts)
27. What about the babies
Sun Mar 11, 2012, 12:00 AM
Mar 2012

None other than the great Abraham Maslow first identified women who find it easy to breastfeed and women who cease their attempts quickly recognizing stress, anxiety, or an inability to meet their infant's food demands, raise children who are psychologically secure in their relationships with others.

Women who have a difficult time breastfeeding, but preserve in the face of anxiety, stress, and perhaps insufficient food supplies raise babies with an inhibited sense of security.

If you are a mother who finds it easy to breastfeed wonderful, if you are a breastfeeding challenged mother know your infant may model her world as anxiety filled, replicating her earliest experiences. If you sense your child is not satiated, she may link hunger to an unsatisfiable need. Obesity may be linked not to a lack of breastfeeding, but a linking for infants between the hunger cue and an inability to be satisfied.

Liquid gold and emerging psychological patterns are not unrelated. Thus each mother must enjoy reflecting on her own experience of breastfeeding and choose both physical and psychological health for her baby.

The United States Breastfeeding Committee does not have an American Psychological Association advisor on the board. The psychological perspective of breastfeeding attempts is not represented in the most powerful breastfeeding advocacy group in the US.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The evil breastfeeding conspiracy. Crunchy Frog Mar 2012 #1
Did you read the entire essay? REP Mar 2012 #2
It'd help if you didn't link to a site Confusious Mar 2012 #6
Oh, good grief Warpy Mar 2012 #3
The thing is the "extra benefits" are over hyped and women are guilted into it REP Mar 2012 #4
Since you didn't quote the whole thing and Harper's didn't make it available Warpy Mar 2012 #5
Ah crap. Wasn't aware it wasn't available. I'd copy the whole thing except for DU's copyright rules. REP Mar 2012 #7
Studies have said it's better Confusious Mar 2012 #8
For immunity, if continued 3-6 months REP Mar 2012 #9
I can probably find 10 studies that say they do have those benefits. Confusious Mar 2012 #17
This message was self-deleted by its author seaglass Mar 2012 #19
It's a reference from the essay, quoted in my OP REP Mar 2012 #21
I wouldn't; sounds like potential copyright trouble. gkhouston Mar 2012 #22
Yeah, me too - guess I'm radical! REP Mar 2012 #23
Same here. Well said n/t Catherina Mar 2012 #24
Women are incredibly sad when they cannot breastfeed. Adriennecliona Mar 2012 #28
It's one of those questions that was scientifically settled before the backwards march started... saras Mar 2012 #10
Breast feeding was a good choice for my little boy and I Nikia Mar 2012 #11
The best thing about breastfeeding, for me, was my health improvement clyrc Mar 2012 #12
I think breastfeeding is great. Fight profit-making companies like Nestlé Catherina Mar 2012 #13
The great Nestle boycott Catherina Mar 2012 #14
Nestle boycott list Catherina Mar 2012 #15
For women without access to potable water, this has always made sense REP Mar 2012 #16
I understand better now Catherina Mar 2012 #18
One of the first things you learn as a parent is that no matter what choices you make gkhouston Mar 2012 #20
Haha. Really? Catherina Mar 2012 #25
Re-read the post: "I wonder what *would* have happened." gkhouston Mar 2012 #26
What about the babies Adriennecliona Mar 2012 #27
Hi, Neighbor! REP Mar 2012 #29
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Feminists»Harpers - The Tyranny of ...»Reply #27