Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Feminists
In reply to the discussion: The Reason I Have Been Silent. [View all]DURHAM D
(32,854 posts)188. I think you will need to pee on a stick before
she/he accepts your credentials.
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
244 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I subscribe to this forum, but have purposely followed this debacle in only a very superficial way..
hlthe2b
Feb 2012
#3
do YOU understand the lesson? iverglas was fuckin RIGHT in all her hard ass.
seabeyond
Feb 2012
#229
by having NO rules... is what weakened the SoP. every time we wanted a rule in it, we hear EXclusive
seabeyond
Feb 2012
#232
Leader doesn't look so week to me. she has not been in there for 7 days, so a week
seabeyond
Feb 2012
#235
you are right, the SoP doesnt matter because the lead host does not have to honor it anyway
seabeyond
Feb 2012
#238
The solution to that was to remove the offending hosts or get them to resign.
laconicsax
Feb 2012
#52
having an election is a coup. having no votes and declaring victory is honorable. this is the world
seabeyond
Feb 2012
#33
we had an election twice, and voted redqueen and that is a coup. she has NO votes
seabeyond
Feb 2012
#37
you said you were uncomfortable with the group. i made the suggestion so you and others
seabeyond
Feb 2012
#116
yes maddez.. it is. trying to work with people that said they wanted to be a part of our
seabeyond
Feb 2012
#126
yes... the point is i was trying to make this an environment to welcome all. i get that. i failed
seabeyond
Feb 2012
#131
The point is that you have been saying that she was not elected, and that's not true.
yardwork
Feb 2012
#134
this is not a tough one. a business hires an employee. some dont always turn out to be
seabeyond
Feb 2012
#133
This isn't right. Not what should be going on here. All of it pretty disappointing.
patrice
Feb 2012
#7
All, as in, I'm not singling anyone out. Everyone needs to do what it takes to get along. nt
patrice
Feb 2012
#13
Removing all other hosts and shutting down discussion on the matter isn't a power grab?
laconicsax
Feb 2012
#43
Neoma, I have privately apologized to you for my past disrespectful comments to you, but please
Ruby the Liberal
Feb 2012
#22
"It's offensive to say that your opinions are invalid because you aren't a woman."
mistertrickster
Feb 2012
#25
Hey, pac. I don't agree with you at all given her unilateral sacking of all other hosts today...
Violet_Crumble
Feb 2012
#66
She was invited to become a host by them. And she was made lead host by them.
yardwork
Feb 2012
#209
Another thing. The host you sacked who you called a 'she' is actually a 'he'..
Violet_Crumble
Feb 2012
#67
Yes, the bit where she sacks the other hosts coz someone dared unpin her post is a highlight...
Violet_Crumble
Feb 2012
#70
would that be when she refused to talk to any cohosts from saturday evening on? we would be the ones
seabeyond
Feb 2012
#85
we can create any story that we want as a supposition. saturday night she quit talking to us
seabeyond
Feb 2012
#93
As you know, they probably weren't "independent" decisions --just independent from you
Remember Me
Feb 2012
#124
misrepresentation and fabrication impresses you? it is easy to make something look pretty
seabeyond
Feb 2012
#71
what part puts me in a bad light? that i quoted a post that said "you fucking bigots"? or
seabeyond
Feb 2012
#74
this is my point. putting together a balanced and fair representation of facts does not matter. it
seabeyond
Feb 2012
#76
why would people who do not participate in our forum, or are not members of our forum's
seabeyond
Feb 2012
#88
lisa d, do we open up the vote to all people on du dscussion board for our group host? nt
seabeyond
Feb 2012
#94
or, the voting happens and it is there to see. i dont have that info. but as many said, there is
seabeyond
Feb 2012
#98
people who post in the gorup discussing feminist issues and people that have membership
seabeyond
Feb 2012
#95
it is clear who participates in the forum. it would be EXclusive, something we avoid, having been
seabeyond
Feb 2012
#99
i havent participated in that and i have no desire to. i only speak to what i know.
seabeyond
Feb 2012
#101
again, i think it is pretty simple to see if a person participates in the feminsit discussion in
seabeyond
Feb 2012
#103
Sounds like the phrase "regular women" that has also been tossed around this forum lately.
yardwork
Feb 2012
#122
I was dragged into this nonsense by the disruption that spread from here to other parts of DU.
yardwork
Feb 2012
#144
I notice once again this host is MIA and unaccountable to the group members.
boston bean
Feb 2012
#78
Neoma: re: Skinner's statement on responsibilities of a Forum or Group host...
hlthe2b
Feb 2012
#164
I thnk it's completely unfair and unkind to equate this action with being right wing
CreekDog
Feb 2012
#176
Nobody's orchestrating anything. The previous hosts of this group made Neoma the lead host.
yardwork
Feb 2012
#197
can I ask if calling the action a Republican style action is the meme of the day?
CreekDog
Feb 2012
#199