Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Feminists
In reply to the discussion: The Reason I Have Been Silent. [View all]quinnox
(20,600 posts)69. As an outsider to this group, this OP very much impresses me
I have to recommend it. In my opinion this OP shows sensitivity as well as leadership qualities. That is my two coppers.
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
244 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I subscribe to this forum, but have purposely followed this debacle in only a very superficial way..
hlthe2b
Feb 2012
#3
do YOU understand the lesson? iverglas was fuckin RIGHT in all her hard ass.
seabeyond
Feb 2012
#229
by having NO rules... is what weakened the SoP. every time we wanted a rule in it, we hear EXclusive
seabeyond
Feb 2012
#232
Leader doesn't look so week to me. she has not been in there for 7 days, so a week
seabeyond
Feb 2012
#235
you are right, the SoP doesnt matter because the lead host does not have to honor it anyway
seabeyond
Feb 2012
#238
The solution to that was to remove the offending hosts or get them to resign.
laconicsax
Feb 2012
#52
having an election is a coup. having no votes and declaring victory is honorable. this is the world
seabeyond
Feb 2012
#33
we had an election twice, and voted redqueen and that is a coup. she has NO votes
seabeyond
Feb 2012
#37
you said you were uncomfortable with the group. i made the suggestion so you and others
seabeyond
Feb 2012
#116
yes maddez.. it is. trying to work with people that said they wanted to be a part of our
seabeyond
Feb 2012
#126
yes... the point is i was trying to make this an environment to welcome all. i get that. i failed
seabeyond
Feb 2012
#131
The point is that you have been saying that she was not elected, and that's not true.
yardwork
Feb 2012
#134
this is not a tough one. a business hires an employee. some dont always turn out to be
seabeyond
Feb 2012
#133
This isn't right. Not what should be going on here. All of it pretty disappointing.
patrice
Feb 2012
#7
All, as in, I'm not singling anyone out. Everyone needs to do what it takes to get along. nt
patrice
Feb 2012
#13
Removing all other hosts and shutting down discussion on the matter isn't a power grab?
laconicsax
Feb 2012
#43
Neoma, I have privately apologized to you for my past disrespectful comments to you, but please
Ruby the Liberal
Feb 2012
#22
"It's offensive to say that your opinions are invalid because you aren't a woman."
mistertrickster
Feb 2012
#25
Hey, pac. I don't agree with you at all given her unilateral sacking of all other hosts today...
Violet_Crumble
Feb 2012
#66
She was invited to become a host by them. And she was made lead host by them.
yardwork
Feb 2012
#209
Another thing. The host you sacked who you called a 'she' is actually a 'he'..
Violet_Crumble
Feb 2012
#67
Yes, the bit where she sacks the other hosts coz someone dared unpin her post is a highlight...
Violet_Crumble
Feb 2012
#70
would that be when she refused to talk to any cohosts from saturday evening on? we would be the ones
seabeyond
Feb 2012
#85
we can create any story that we want as a supposition. saturday night she quit talking to us
seabeyond
Feb 2012
#93
As you know, they probably weren't "independent" decisions --just independent from you
Remember Me
Feb 2012
#124
misrepresentation and fabrication impresses you? it is easy to make something look pretty
seabeyond
Feb 2012
#71
what part puts me in a bad light? that i quoted a post that said "you fucking bigots"? or
seabeyond
Feb 2012
#74
this is my point. putting together a balanced and fair representation of facts does not matter. it
seabeyond
Feb 2012
#76
why would people who do not participate in our forum, or are not members of our forum's
seabeyond
Feb 2012
#88
lisa d, do we open up the vote to all people on du dscussion board for our group host? nt
seabeyond
Feb 2012
#94
or, the voting happens and it is there to see. i dont have that info. but as many said, there is
seabeyond
Feb 2012
#98
people who post in the gorup discussing feminist issues and people that have membership
seabeyond
Feb 2012
#95
it is clear who participates in the forum. it would be EXclusive, something we avoid, having been
seabeyond
Feb 2012
#99
i havent participated in that and i have no desire to. i only speak to what i know.
seabeyond
Feb 2012
#101
again, i think it is pretty simple to see if a person participates in the feminsit discussion in
seabeyond
Feb 2012
#103
Sounds like the phrase "regular women" that has also been tossed around this forum lately.
yardwork
Feb 2012
#122
I was dragged into this nonsense by the disruption that spread from here to other parts of DU.
yardwork
Feb 2012
#144
I notice once again this host is MIA and unaccountable to the group members.
boston bean
Feb 2012
#78
Neoma: re: Skinner's statement on responsibilities of a Forum or Group host...
hlthe2b
Feb 2012
#164
I thnk it's completely unfair and unkind to equate this action with being right wing
CreekDog
Feb 2012
#176
Nobody's orchestrating anything. The previous hosts of this group made Neoma the lead host.
yardwork
Feb 2012
#197
can I ask if calling the action a Republican style action is the meme of the day?
CreekDog
Feb 2012
#199