Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ShazzieB

(19,304 posts)
5. They knew better than to invoke "natural law."
Mon Jul 18, 2022, 12:03 AM
Jul 2022

That would have sounded too overtly Catholic. The Catholic Church doesn't have a monopoly on the concept of "natural law," and it didn't originate with the Church, but it has a central place in catholic theology and forms the basis of many key teachings, including the prohibitions on both abortion and birth control.

"Unborn human being" is more subtle, and it doen't scream, "Catholic!" in quite the same wat "natural law" would. It was a shrewd choice, imo.

I agree about how it sets the stage for future cases. When (not if) what you describe happens, it'll all depend on the makeup of the court at that time. The implications are terrifying.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Women's Rights & Issues»How the Supreme Court rec...»Reply #5