Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Creative Speculation

In reply to the discussion: 9/11 Aeronautics [View all]

superbeachnut

(381 posts)
3. Why would there be cameras aimed at planes hitting the Pentagon?
Thu Jul 10, 2014, 02:04 AM
Jul 2014

There are no videos. 911 truth fails to understand

RADAR proves 77 hit the Pentagon.
DNA from everyone on the plane, including the terrorists was found in the Pentagon, except the small kid.
FDR from Flight 77 was found in the Pentagon on the damage path of the exact heading/true course 77 impacted at, stored in the FDR and verified by RADAR.
Witnesses saw 77 impact the Pentagon, the same time RADAR has 77 on RADAR at the Pentagon. OOPS

911 truth wants something that does not exist, and ignore RADAR, FDR, DNA?

DNA in the damage path, from the exact kinetic energy impact damage a 757 made. Did 911 truth read the study of the Pentagon building performance hit by a 757 going 483.5 Knots?
http://www.twf.org/News/Y2003/01-PBPR.pdf
A report which confirms the damage done by a 757. Real experts, real report.


RADAR proves 77 impacted.
http://www2.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB196/doc02.pdf
https://www.ntsb.gov/doclib/foia/9_11/Rec_Radar_Data_Study_all_aircraft.pdf
These reports are from raw data you can get, and check; the data proves it was 77, not a swapped plane, etc. Solid proof, makes your video needs silly since there are no videos except the ones we have seen.

Who needs video - only 911 truth needs to talk of video to help keep their delusional inside job fantasy.

https://www.ntsb.gov/doclib/foia/9_11/AAL77_fdr.pdf
Who needs video, we have the FDR, it proves 77 impacted the Pentagon, to the second.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Creative Speculation»9/11 Aeronautics»Reply #3