Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

johndoeX

(268 posts)
32. Ding ding ding!
Fri Jun 27, 2014, 08:38 AM
Jun 2014

Very good Seger!

The three types of loads are air(flight), ground and water....

They are further defined, wait for it......



Yep...you guessed it... under Part 25. Very good Seger!

So, what does it say under Flight Loads?


§25.321 General.

(a) Flight load factors represent the ratio of the aerodynamic force component (acting normal to the assumed longitudinal axis of the airplane) to the weight of the airplane. A positive load factor is one in which the aerodynamic force acts upward with respect to the airplane.



Do you know what "upwards" means, Seger?

I'll give you a hint, it is NOT the force acting on the nose of the airplane from speed.


Seger, airspeed limitations set by the manufacturer are not just structural, they are also for control. Loss of control can (and has) lead to structural failure.

There is no margin of safety past Vd for an aircraft which is experiencing changes in static and dynamic pressure. Which is why you cannot quote one. The margin of safety is between Vmo and Vd based on wind tunnel and flight testing.

&feature=kp

"Nobody knows!" - William Seger




You lose --again-- Seger...

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

William Seger - Epic Fail [View all] johndoeX Jun 2014 OP
Who is Helen Borg Jun 2014 #1
Leslie? delphi72 Jun 2014 #2
Fringe pilot group fails to define Vd, uses googled journalist made up definition superbeachnut Jun 2014 #3
With conspiracy hucksters and frauds ... William Seger Jun 2014 #4
The "Defined Limit Load" johndoeX Jun 2014 #5
Fraud! William Seger Jun 2014 #10
Third time asked Seger, johndoeX Jun 2014 #12
Another feeble attempt at deception William Seger Jun 2014 #14
So, just to be clear... johndoeX Jun 2014 #15
WTF?!?! William Seger Jun 2014 #17
"Flying at Vd puts loads on the airframe" johndoeX Jun 2014 #18
For probably not the last time... William Seger Jun 2014 #20
Ok... now we are getting somewhere.... johndoeX Jun 2014 #21
"Getting somewhere," huh William Seger Jun 2014 #24
Nobody knows? johndoeX Jun 2014 #25
ROFLMAO. There's that bizarre Balsamo "debating" technique again William Seger Jun 2014 #26
The test is based on FAR Part 25 johndoeX Jun 2014 #27
Un-freakin-believable William Seger Jun 2014 #28
Loads johndoeX Jun 2014 #29
ALL types of loads are covered by the definitions in 25.301(a) William Seger Jun 2014 #31
Ding ding ding! johndoeX Jun 2014 #32
"You lose!" shouted Cap'n Bob from the bottom of his smoldering crater William Seger Jun 2014 #33
The FAA johndoeX Jun 2014 #34
Impossible lie exposed, pilots for truth next Gish Gallop superbeachnut Jun 2014 #6
Just a "journalist"? johndoeX Jun 2014 #7
The Vd definition is made up - why fake a definition to support a lie superbeachnut Jun 2014 #8
Why Beachy why? johndoeX Jun 2014 #9
Grade school kids more experience than needed to debunk pilots for truth superbeachnut Jun 2014 #11
"A mathematician"? johndoeX Jun 2014 #13
Flew a desk quote mining lie, mirrors the fake Vd definition quote mining failure superbeachnut Jun 2014 #16
Beachy - where did you get the diagram in your above post? johndoeX Jun 2014 #19
attacking a person, does not make the data wrong - no matter what other topics the person got wrong superbeachnut Jun 2014 #22
So, you agree with Frank? johndoeX Jun 2014 #23
pilots for truth expose they lack the expertise to decode the FDR superbeachnut Jun 2014 #30
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Creative Speculation»William Seger - Epic Fail»Reply #32