Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

William Seger

(11,724 posts)
20. For probably not the last time...
Fri Jun 27, 2014, 01:22 AM
Jun 2014
is your problem?

[font size=+1]NO[/font], I do not "feel" that "Vd is a 'limit load' defined under FAR 25.301, and that there is an 'Ultimate Load' defined as 1.5 x Vd based on FAR 25.303."

I believe what [font size=+1]I[/font] have actually said about it: The conditions in 25.305 are cases that must be considered when estimating the limit loads on an airframe. The FAA seems to agree with that "feeling," as do engineers on two professional forums.

So far, your "rebuttal" is, "I'm certified by the FAA to teach this material and you're not," and "here's a list of people," and "let me show you this fucking irrelevant Vg again," and "here's another one I faked."

So for probably not the last time, why should anyone believe "impossible speed" claims from someone who doesn't even understand we're "debating" here?



Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

William Seger - Epic Fail [View all] johndoeX Jun 2014 OP
Who is Helen Borg Jun 2014 #1
Leslie? delphi72 Jun 2014 #2
Fringe pilot group fails to define Vd, uses googled journalist made up definition superbeachnut Jun 2014 #3
With conspiracy hucksters and frauds ... William Seger Jun 2014 #4
The "Defined Limit Load" johndoeX Jun 2014 #5
Fraud! William Seger Jun 2014 #10
Third time asked Seger, johndoeX Jun 2014 #12
Another feeble attempt at deception William Seger Jun 2014 #14
So, just to be clear... johndoeX Jun 2014 #15
WTF?!?! William Seger Jun 2014 #17
"Flying at Vd puts loads on the airframe" johndoeX Jun 2014 #18
For probably not the last time... William Seger Jun 2014 #20
Ok... now we are getting somewhere.... johndoeX Jun 2014 #21
"Getting somewhere," huh William Seger Jun 2014 #24
Nobody knows? johndoeX Jun 2014 #25
ROFLMAO. There's that bizarre Balsamo "debating" technique again William Seger Jun 2014 #26
The test is based on FAR Part 25 johndoeX Jun 2014 #27
Un-freakin-believable William Seger Jun 2014 #28
Loads johndoeX Jun 2014 #29
ALL types of loads are covered by the definitions in 25.301(a) William Seger Jun 2014 #31
Ding ding ding! johndoeX Jun 2014 #32
"You lose!" shouted Cap'n Bob from the bottom of his smoldering crater William Seger Jun 2014 #33
The FAA johndoeX Jun 2014 #34
Impossible lie exposed, pilots for truth next Gish Gallop superbeachnut Jun 2014 #6
Just a "journalist"? johndoeX Jun 2014 #7
The Vd definition is made up - why fake a definition to support a lie superbeachnut Jun 2014 #8
Why Beachy why? johndoeX Jun 2014 #9
Grade school kids more experience than needed to debunk pilots for truth superbeachnut Jun 2014 #11
"A mathematician"? johndoeX Jun 2014 #13
Flew a desk quote mining lie, mirrors the fake Vd definition quote mining failure superbeachnut Jun 2014 #16
Beachy - where did you get the diagram in your above post? johndoeX Jun 2014 #19
attacking a person, does not make the data wrong - no matter what other topics the person got wrong superbeachnut Jun 2014 #22
So, you agree with Frank? johndoeX Jun 2014 #23
pilots for truth expose they lack the expertise to decode the FDR superbeachnut Jun 2014 #30
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Creative Speculation»William Seger - Epic Fail»Reply #20