Israel/Palestine

aranthus

(3,387 posts)

7. If Palestine is to be from the River to the Sea, then where are they going to put Israel?

Sat Dec 1, 2018, 12:19 PM

Dec 2018

The phrase "From the River to the Sea" has such a well known anti-Israel, anti-Jewish meaning, that his claim that he meant to say something different is not at all credible, and your belief in him amounts to denial. What is truly troubling is that the same type of people and media who called racist dog whistle when the Republican candidate for governor in Florida said "monkey up" are now defending something that is not so much a dog whistle as it is a piercing shriek. It's dishonest. And the only reason I can think of for the dishonesty is that those people actually agree with Hill's extremist views.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

14 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

CNN fires Marc Lamont Hill in wake of remarks criticizing Israel and calling for a 'free Palestine' [View all] Eugene Nov 2018 OP

CNN acted cowardly in firing him... ADX Nov 2018 #1

"From the river to the sea" oberliner Nov 2018 #2

Baloney! aranthus Nov 2018 #3

Please enlighten those of us too stupid and ignorant to be journalists then... ADX Dec 2018 #4

Here is a small sample aranthus Dec 2018 #5

MLH called for "a free Palestine from the river to the sea"... ADX Dec 2018 #6

If Palestine is to be from the River to the Sea, then where are they going to put Israel? aranthus Dec 2018 #7

I'm not in denial of shit, I just happen to disagree with you... ADX Dec 2018 #8

I think you're the one who's myopic aranthus Dec 2018 #9

*SIGH* ADX Dec 2018 #10

I understand that you explained it aranthus Dec 2018 #11

Of course it doesn't make sense to you... ADX Dec 2018 #12

There is also the expression Sudsy Dec 2018 #13

Because it's not true. aranthus Dec 2018 #14