At least four dead in Palestinian truck-ramming attack in Jerusalem: police

[branford]

6. You didn't answer my question or really address the issue in my post.

I understand you don't want to see any retaliation against purportedly innocent parties. However, many of those parties are often not nearly as innocent as you suggest.

If the family is associated with various terror groups and/or knew of the attack, are they legitimate targets of reprisal?

Similarly, if the PA lauds the terrorist as a hero or martyr and then even goes further and financially compensates the family (with a budget mostly comprising aid received from the EU and USA), is the PA a legitimate target of retaliation?

Is property owned by the terrorist himself subject to destruction, even though it might benefit third-parties like family members?

Moreover, if you don't want to see Israel retaliate, wouldn't the most effective evidence that it would be unnecessary or unproductive almost certainly be demonstrated action by the PA (since this attacked originated in the West Bank or Jerusalem) that they are sincerely attempting to apprehend and punish all groups and individuals associated with the attack or planning others, and at the VERY least, not actually lionizing a murderer and financially rewarding his family?