Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

karynnj

(60,081 posts)
9. The UN has not been silent on Syria
Sun Dec 25, 2016, 09:28 AM
Dec 2016

1) A UN envoy has taken the lead for several years in trying to get peace talks and to coordinate whatever aid they can get into Syria. They have been unsuccessful, but not silent.

2) I seem to remember many UN meetings dealing with Syria - in 2 recent ones, Samantha Powers and John Kerry respectively were not silent at all.

3) It IS true that there were no recent resolutions. The reason is pretty obvious - Russia has a veto. (This would be like saying that until this week, the UN was silent on Israel for the 8 year Obama term. We vetoed every other resolution. The last Syrian resolution was a very hard fought one initiated by John Kerry and worked on by many countries including Russia, Saudi Arabia and Iran. That resolution was the basis for much that the UN tried to do.

The US and EU DOES call the settlements in Crimea etc illegal -- that is why fairly onerous sanctions are in place. There is no UN resolution because they have a veto. Seriously, the US sanctions on Russia are FAR MORE SEVERE a response than the US abstaining as the rest of the Security Council votes for a resolution.

It is a jump in logic to think praying at the Western Wall is illegal. Though the Knesset has worked hard to make it illegal for reform or conservative rabbis to lead any prayer at the Western Wall -- much less women doing so. Not all Jews wanting to pray are male and Orthodox.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Just to clarify, this means that America just took a largely symbolic stand against Israel? HoneyBadger Dec 2016 #1
It took a stand against the settlements that threaten geek tragedy Dec 2016 #2
There are many Israelis who oppose the settlements and support a two-state solution oberliner Dec 2016 #3
W. Jerusalem is a separate issue from this resolution nt geek tragedy Dec 2016 #4
Talking about the Jewish Quarter, Western Wall, Temple Mount oberliner Dec 2016 #5
What does that have to legalizing colonial outposts geek tragedy Dec 2016 #7
Have you read the resolution? oberliner Dec 2016 #8
Yes, the resolution opposes Israel's slow-motion annexation geek tragedy Dec 2016 #14
The Palestinians have rejected every offer of 2 states going back 8 decades.... shira Dec 2016 #16
Until fairly recently it was just Jerusalem oberliner Dec 2016 #17
Fighting over holy places is very 12th century. geek tragedy Dec 2016 #18
Agreed oberliner Dec 2016 #19
One takeaway is that UN is still obsessed w/ Israel. Silent on Syria, Yemen... shira Dec 2016 #6
The UN has not been silent on Syria karynnj Dec 2016 #9
Ban Ki-moon says UN has 'disproportionate' focus on Israel oberliner Dec 2016 #10
Samantha Powers 2 days ago... shira Dec 2016 #11
Where specifically have you seen the US & EU call Russian settlements.... shira Dec 2016 #12
Ukraine is the REASON for the Russian sanctions! karynnj Dec 2016 #13
But no language on settlers or settlements. It's only illegal when Jews do it..... shira Dec 2016 #15
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Israel/Palestine»This message was self-del...»Reply #9