If Israel’s Occupation Is Permanent, Why Isn’t It the Same as Apartheid?

[shira]

11. A pseudo-academic study written by 1-state advocates, not neutral academics.

Yawn.

The whole pseudo-academic report is based on John Dugard's claims of Apartheid. The problem is Dugard is an outright antisemite. Dugard supports Hamas terror as legit resistance. Here's more Dugard:

Dugard says in the report that "common sense . . . dictates that a distinction must be drawn between acts of mindless terror, such as acts committed by Al Qaeda, and acts committed in the course of a war of national liberation against colonialism, apartheid, or military occupation."

No surprise that all BDS sources inevitably (like all stupid rightwingers) blow their cover by acknowledging their support of Hamas "freedom fighters". This is neo-fascism no different than the Nazi goal of murdering Jews in masses. Same shit, different century. It'd be real nice if you could ever once quote from BDS'ers who don't support Jew hating psychopaths like Hamas.

Virginia Tilley lead the study, but Tilley is yet another BDS supporting, 1-state drone who wrote a book on that prior to this study. Not a neutral academic by any means, but neither are any of the other idiotic contributors to this mess.

====================================

As I've written to you previously - and to which you have no reply.....

Israeli Arabs also live, work, study, and/or serve for the IDF in the West Bank. And yet they are not being discriminated against, even though they are of the same race, ethnicity, religion as Palestinians in the W.Bank. There's no "Apartheid" against these Israeli Arabs in the W.Bank. Hmm, go figure...

Your garbage sources don't have an answer to that one, which is simple actually. West Bank Palestinians are not citizens of Israel. The conflict is based on competing nationalities, not racial hatred or ethnicity.