Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

danriker

(52 posts)
2. There are many reasons.
Mon Sep 8, 2014, 02:03 PM
Sep 2014

Rapid transit systems do not have widespread support because most people, outside of NYC, have cars. When the parking fees are added to the fares, public transit in many cases is not less expensive, and it is far more inconvenient and uncomfortable.
Many of our cities are so spread out that transit lines are only in convenient distance of a significantly low portion of homes of the population, or of where people need to go.
Here in Portland, OR, the city with the oldest continuously operated street car system - from the 1890s, with rapid transit, many bus lines, very good bike routes, etc, only something like 11% of the people use it.
I think the answer is a combination of electronically-controlled highways with high speed rail systems. The technologies now exist.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Public Transportation and Smart Growth»Public Transit Is Underfu...»Reply #2