Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OKIsItJustMe

(21,206 posts)
10. "greenest non-malthusian path"
Mon Nov 18, 2024, 03:35 PM
Nov 2024

If we could build nuclear plants that fast (I’m afraid we cannot) that will not release us from our “malthusian path.”

If we could eliminate all carbon emissions today, there is already far too much greenhouse gas in the atmosphere (“warming in the pipeline” to borrow a phrase.)

https://www.climate.gov/media/14599

This graph shows the heating influence caused by the major human-produced greenhouse gases: carbon dioxide (gray), methane (dark purple), nitrous oxide (medium purple), chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs, lavender), hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs, blue), and hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs, light blue). Relative to conditions in 1750, today's atmosphere absorbs more than 3 extra watts of energy per square meter of Earth's surface. Graph by NOAA Climate.gov based on data from NOAA Global Monitoring Lab. For the complete list of chemicals in the CFC, HFC, and HCFC groups, see Figure 3 in the Full AGGI Report.Graph by NOAA Climate.gov based on data from NOAA ESRL.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Let's hope the fossil fuel industry runs out of money... Think. Again. Nov 2024 #1
Not sure they're going to need to FBaggins Nov 2024 #2
The CO2 situation is global... Think. Again. Nov 2024 #3
OK, I'm convinced OKIsItJustMe Nov 2024 #12
France and China demonstrated that it can be very fast FBaggins Nov 2024 #17
EDF seems to have lost their mojo OKIsItJustMe Nov 2024 #18
Meeting the new electricity demands of Artificial Idiocy, spyware, cryptocurrencies, etc., isn't enough. hunter Nov 2024 #4
True enough... but only so much can be done in 25 years FBaggins Nov 2024 #5
It could be accomplished quickly if we took the threat of global warming seriously. hunter Nov 2024 #6
James Hansen et al: Target atmospheric CO2: Where should humanity aim? OKIsItJustMe Nov 2024 #9
Let's see, "Pearl Harbor" some dramatic event to wake people up OKIsItJustMe Nov 2024 #11
Nuclear power is not green GoreWon2000 Nov 2024 #7
Your engineer father can be forgiven his error FBaggins Nov 2024 #8
"greenest non-malthusian path" OKIsItJustMe Nov 2024 #10
Your schooling and work credentials on this issue are? GoreWon2000 Nov 2024 #13
Physics - and standing a watch or two on an LA class sub FBaggins Nov 2024 #14
A minor quibble OKIsItJustMe Nov 2024 #15
True enough - I was using it the other way and was too cute FBaggins Nov 2024 #16
Physics not comparable to aviation/automotive engineering GoreWon2000 Nov 2024 #19
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»US Unveils Plan to Triple...»Reply #10