Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Hillary Clinton
Showing Original Post only (View all)Why can’t Sanders admit defeat? He’s looking more and more foolish as he denies Hillary’s victory [View all]
Sanders has lost the primary on every level, making his insistence that he should win anyway subtly sexistOver the weekend, Hillary Clinton won a couple more primary races in Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands expanding her already substantial lead over Bernie Sanders in the Democratic primary contest. But Sanders refuses to give up the ghost, insinuating that he must, on some level, be the real winner and that this fight has to be taken to the convention so he can snatch the prize he clearly believes belongs to him, even as the voters continue disagreeing.
Mr. Sanders, the New York Times reports, insists that the convention will be contested because he is still lobbying superdelegates party officials and state leaders who cast their final votes at the convention to withdraw support from Mrs. Clinton and back him instead.
It is extremely unlikely that Secretary Clinton will have the requisite number of pledged delegates to claim victory on Tuesday night, Sanders said during a news conference Saturday. Now, I have heard reports that Secretary Clinton has said its all going to be over on Tuesday night. I have reports that the media, after the New Jersey results come in, are going to declare that it is all over. That simply is not accurate.
Its a frustrating argument, because Sanders spent most of the campaign portraying superdelegates as some kind of corrupt elites there to deprive the popular winner of the vote. But now that Clinton is the clear winner of the popular vote, suddenly the superdelegates are legitimate again.
Calvinball antics during elections are hardly anything new remember hanging chads? but even by those standards, this is headache-inducing pretzel logic. Its clear the only principle being employed by the Sanders camp is that the only rules that are legitimate are the ones that lead to his win.
To make it worse, Sanders is using some fuzzy math with his pledged delegates argument. Even if the superdelegate system evaporated tomorrow, Clinton would still win. According to the New York Times primary calendar, there are 4,175 pledged delegates total in the Democratic primary. If were just counting pledged delegates and not superdelegates, the number Clinton needs to hit to win is 2,088. She only needs to win 281 delegates to hit that number and win the pledged delegate count. In contrast, Sanders needs to win 571 delegates in order to win the pledged delegates.
Mr. Sanders, the New York Times reports, insists that the convention will be contested because he is still lobbying superdelegates party officials and state leaders who cast their final votes at the convention to withdraw support from Mrs. Clinton and back him instead.
It is extremely unlikely that Secretary Clinton will have the requisite number of pledged delegates to claim victory on Tuesday night, Sanders said during a news conference Saturday. Now, I have heard reports that Secretary Clinton has said its all going to be over on Tuesday night. I have reports that the media, after the New Jersey results come in, are going to declare that it is all over. That simply is not accurate.
Its a frustrating argument, because Sanders spent most of the campaign portraying superdelegates as some kind of corrupt elites there to deprive the popular winner of the vote. But now that Clinton is the clear winner of the popular vote, suddenly the superdelegates are legitimate again.
Calvinball antics during elections are hardly anything new remember hanging chads? but even by those standards, this is headache-inducing pretzel logic. Its clear the only principle being employed by the Sanders camp is that the only rules that are legitimate are the ones that lead to his win.
To make it worse, Sanders is using some fuzzy math with his pledged delegates argument. Even if the superdelegate system evaporated tomorrow, Clinton would still win. According to the New York Times primary calendar, there are 4,175 pledged delegates total in the Democratic primary. If were just counting pledged delegates and not superdelegates, the number Clinton needs to hit to win is 2,088. She only needs to win 281 delegates to hit that number and win the pledged delegate count. In contrast, Sanders needs to win 571 delegates in order to win the pledged delegates.
continues ... http://www.salon.com/2016/06/06/why_cant_sanders_admit_defeat_hes_looking_more_and_more_foolish_as_he_denies_hillarys_victory/
13 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Why can’t Sanders admit defeat? He’s looking more and more foolish as he denies Hillary’s victory [View all]
Her Sister
Jun 2016
OP
OT: Has Sanders released their fundraising numbers yet? Hillary did it on the 1st of this month.
BlueCaliDem
Jun 2016
#3
Amanda Marcotte? I won't feed Salon by clicking on it, but it reads like the rational articles of
BobbyDrake
Jun 2016
#7
She is one of the only ones that's been on HRC's camp from the start, I believe
Her Sister
Jun 2016
#9
I follow her on Twitter, but I haven't been checking lately as I'm on business travel.
BobbyDrake
Jun 2016
#11