Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

daybranch

(1,309 posts)
3. The A-10 should not be retired
Sat Mar 15, 2014, 10:39 AM
Mar 2014

The A-10 with the ability to fly low and slow while remaining relatively invulnerable to ground fire is what we need to fight forces on the group . Without it , we are stuck with fast but very inaccurately firing F-16s or other fighter planes. There is no other plane to fill this role very well.
This is just a case of budget stacking- if we cut this now, then knowing it is very necessary to the mission, you will let us buy a replacement in a couple of years, and in that way we spend as much as possible and lose nothing except very short term.
There are plenty of F-16s they can spare at a lot less disturbance of their mission. They should not be in the business of providing jobs. Their job is to provide defense for the country.
Do not fall for the trick.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Not exactly a military expert, Benton D Struckcheon Mar 2014 #1
Heck of an aircraft. bluedigger Mar 2014 #2
The A-10 should not be retired daybranch Mar 2014 #3
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Congress»Why Congress May Let Air ...»Reply #3