Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Congress

FBaggins

(27,923 posts)

2. Not sure whether or not it's still an option

Reply to nkpolitics1212 (Original post)

Mon Oct 1, 2018, 05:49 PM

Oct 2018

We're right around the point where the NJ court ruled that he could be replaced (despite the deadline in the law)... so every day closer would make it harder and harder to accomplish (assuming Menendez would drop out of course).

I'm not sure whether or not they amended the law after 2002... but early voting has already started in NJ. I don't think that was an option in 2002. So it may already be too late.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Will NJ Democrats do to Menendez-D what they did to Torricelli-D in 2002? [View all] nkpolitics1212 Oct 2018 OP

Corzine?!?!?! vi5 Oct 2018 #1

What if the NJ Democratic Party leadership had stayed neutral and the grassroots aggressively nkpolitics1212 Oct 2018 #3

The NJ Democratic party doesn't know the meaning of the word neutral.... vi5 Oct 2018 #4

Not sure whether or not it's still an option FBaggins Oct 2018 #2