Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Washington

pat_k

(10,886 posts)

1. Too bad about 2066

Reply to RandySF (Original post)

Tue Sep 17, 2024, 01:37 AM

Sep 2024

Perhaps closer to the election people will learn more.

The thing is, as I understand it, state law already guarantees people can have natural gas if they want it. The aim of 2066 as far as I can tell is to force cities/towns and utility companies to keep maintaining outdated infrastructure and actually prohibit these entities from even formulating plans for reducing the use of fossil fuels.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

1 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Washington ballot initiatives lose ground with voters in new poll [View all] RandySF Sep 2024 OP

Too bad about 2066 pat_k Sep 2024 #1