Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

South Carolina

still_one

(97,079 posts)

4. That is a different issue. The ballot instructions are not reflecting that ruling, and that is what

Reply to SCantiGOP (Reply #3)

Sun Oct 11, 2020, 09:41 AM

Oct 2020

needs to be presented, for those who have a ballot rejected because of no witness signature, it is incumbent upon the state to send those rejected ballots because of no witness signature, a new ballot with an addendum explaining that a witness signature is required

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

S.C. absentee ballot received by a voter after SCOTUS ruling ... [Twitter] [View all] sl8 Oct 2020 OP

Then we need to take this to court immediately that the ballot instructions are incorrect still_one Oct 2020 #1

It's already been to the US Supreme Court SCantiGOP Oct 2020 #3

That is a different issue. The ballot instructions are not reflecting that ruling, and that is what still_one Oct 2020 #4

I don't see how they can flip-flop on this the way they have right before the election nt Shermann Oct 2020 #2

That is why this needs to be taken to the court again because the ballot instructions are not still_one Oct 2020 #5