Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

FakeNoose

(36,505 posts)
3. Here you go
Sat Sep 4, 2021, 08:17 AM
Sep 2021

From the OP:

If Kraft Heinz had properly recorded these transactions, its cost of goods sold would have been about $50 million higher between 2015 and the end of 2018, the SEC concluded.

The SEC said the company’s actions artificially inflated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, a metric used by investors to judge operating performance.

The motivation to show drastic year-over-year cost savings was partly personal — executives bonuses were heavily reliant on this metric.


They were all in on it because they all got their yearly bonuses.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

That sucks. OAITW r.2.0 Sep 2021 #1
He was only fined 300k and the company lost 62 million??!?!? flying_wahini Sep 2021 #2
Here you go FakeNoose Sep 2021 #3
Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Pennsylvania»Kraft Heinz to pay $62M t...»Reply #3