Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Pennsylvania

FakeNoose

(36,538 posts)

6. The tax should be on the soda manufacturers and distributors

Reply to TexasTowelie (Original post)

Fri Feb 28, 2020, 08:50 AM

Feb 2020

Consumers will still ultimately pay the tax. But when the manufacturers and marketers feel the pinch, they will develop healthier products that don't contain the sugar or high-fructose sweeteners.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Philly's soda tax didn't lead to people drinking less soda, study says [View all] TexasTowelie Feb 2020 OP

The way people here complain about it, you'd think it was the end of the world. BlueTsunami2018 Feb 2020 #1

Major supermarket closed Freddie Feb 2020 #4

People hate being lied to ... PBC_Democrat Feb 2020 #2

Soda really is pretty bad for you. It was worth a try. Squinch Feb 2020 #3

It's a "sin tax" Freddie Feb 2020 #5

The tax should be on the soda manufacturers and distributors FakeNoose Feb 2020 #6

The Philly soda tax Freddie Feb 2020 #8

When Obama doubled the cost of cigarettes it didn't change my smoking habit. So now the abqtommy Feb 2020 #7