Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

New York

BumRushDaShow

(145,968 posts)

3. I believe that portions of that Thruway include federal interstates (e.g., I-91, I-87, I-95 etc)

Reply to PJMcK (Reply #2)

Sun Feb 4, 2018, 07:30 AM

Feb 2018

and they apparently require standardized signage on and along the interstates. So it might not have to do with the "physical" installations but what they probably consider "clutter" on the signs.

Edit to add - FHWA site info - https://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/ser-shs_millennium.htm

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

New York to remove highway signs after feds threaten to pull $14M [View all] TexasTowelie Feb 2018 OP

Signs are a ridiculous waste of money and are plastered all along the Interstate Highways. democratisphere Feb 2018 #1

Strange story PJMcK Feb 2018 #2

I believe that portions of that Thruway include federal interstates (e.g., I-91, I-87, I-95 etc) BumRushDaShow Feb 2018 #3

Interesting PJMcK Feb 2018 #4

Not my OP BumRushDaShow Feb 2018 #6

It's interesting that in other matters gopers push "states rights" groundloop Feb 2018 #5

They love to cherry-pick BumRushDaShow Feb 2018 #7

Signs are located near the shoulders and they are done in a Burma Shave format with democratisphere Feb 2018 #8