Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

New Jersey

3Hotdogs

(13,756 posts)

13. What law might that be?

Reply to OnDoutside (Reply #7)

Tue May 1, 2018, 04:27 PM

May 2018

I can't think of a law that would be more objectionable to Dems than to Reps.

They could require all candidates to have been convicted of, or accused of immoral behavior, adultery. That might allow more Reps onto the ballot.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

19 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

NJ Bill Requires GE Presidential Candidates to Release their Income Tax Returns [View all] JustAnotherGen May 2018 OP

states have no authority in federal matters nt msongs May 2018 #1

And the US Constitution provides an exhaustive list of requirements Cicada May 2018 #2

Nope - JustAnotherGen May 2018 #5

I don't think states can overrule the constitution Cicada May 2018 #12

Ha it's not the President Job Requirements JustAnotherGen May 2018 #17

Well, here's someone who thinks it's possible ehrnst May 2018 #3

Exactly JustAnotherGen May 2018 #6

In order to get on the ballot JustAnotherGen May 2018 #4

Thanks. murielm99 May 2018 #10

It probably won't happen but could Republican controlled states OnDoutside May 2018 #7

I'm of the mindset JustAnotherGen May 2018 #9

Good point. OnDoutside May 2018 #11

What law might that be? 3Hotdogs May 2018 #13

I'm not sure but if you look at the sheer neck of those idiots in NC, anything OnDoutside May 2018 #14

They already passed voter ID laws. nt Lucky Luciano May 2018 #16

K&R. They all should volunteer the infornation for transparency's sake lunamagica May 2018 #8

I agree. nt brer cat May 2018 #15

No veto this time around, and I believe Democrats have larger % in both houses? (not sure) George II May 2018 #18

Yep we sure do! JustAnotherGen May 2018 #19