She tried so hard to deflect that "any issues would be satisfied by a panel of judges if the computer check bounces it", yet refused to commit that there was NOT a programmed "EXACT match" on the signature, though I asked her at least five times. I told her that with 100s of thousands of voters in the county and millions statewide, there would be NO way for judges to keep up with the numbers of computer-rejected ballots and those who arrived just before election day would likely NOT get counted. That if all counties (as she seemed to acknowledge) had added middle names to the signature on the return envelope, the number of people who would not know how to sign would be immense.
She tried all the tricks to deflect and told me if I had volunteered as a election judge I'd be reassured, to which I asked how the rest of the state voters were going to be reassured, especially as they see the tactics going on in other states? She of course brushed that off as having interest only in CO, to which I told her that loss of confidence nationwide was surely going to require her to do everything possible to reassure Colorado voters. I asked a total of 8 times if she would put in writing that a full signature with middle name, a signature with middle initial, or both would not get rejected by the computer programming if the signature elements were otherwise the same. She kept deflecting but when I told her I would agree to share that info with the media with whom I'd already contacted and help deflect IF I was convinced what she said was true, she begrudgingly suggested she would. I have my doubts....
VOTERS beware~!
= new reply since forum marked as read