Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Artists

gladium et scutum

(811 posts)

8. it was was a unamous decision

Reply to appalachiablue (Reply #4)

Wed Feb 3, 2021, 10:43 PM

Feb 2021

that means the liberal justices of the court agreed with the conservative justices of the court in this decision. What reform do you suggest when the liberal members of the Court agree with the Conservative members of the Court?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

U.S. Supreme Court: Germany Can't Be Sued In Nazi Stolen Art Case, Guelph Treasure Owned By Goering [View all] appalachiablue Feb 2021 OP

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Feb 2021 #1

Heavens no, the reason they were appointed. appalachiablue Feb 2021 #2

Last week Rachel Maddow asked Schumer about balancing SCOTUS BigmanPigman Feb 2021 #3

We really need reform, I hope Dems move on this soon appalachiablue Feb 2021 #4

I know. I don't want to wait 6 months. BigmanPigman Feb 2021 #5

Two years is what we have, then another huge showdown! appalachiablue Feb 2021 #6

it was was a unamous decision gladium et scutum Feb 2021 #8

Balanced? gladium et scutum Feb 2021 #7