Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

malthaussen

(18,083 posts)
2. "For What it's Worth," based on the criterion...
Sat Feb 22, 2025, 12:41 PM
Feb 22

... that it is more applicable to multiple eras than the other two. "Fortunate Son" is very much a Vietnam-specific song in my mind, and "Ohio" applies only to a very extreme incident which is (as yet) something not universal in the US. But "For What it's Worth" is something that seems to be relateable every year.

But one could make the argument that "Fortunate Son" applies to more than Vietnam, and is representative of the vast gulf that currently separates the privileged class from the regular folk, and I wouldn't say they're wrong.

Judged only as a piece of Music, "Fortunate Son" wins out, IMO, because it is a real rocker, unlike the other two.

-- Mal

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»The DU Lounge»Better song: Fortunate So...»Reply #2