Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
The DU Lounge
In reply to the discussion: The death of text. [View all]jfz9580m
(15,584 posts)50. Not to butt in
But apparently it is true. I was surprised too..
https://www.businessinsider.com/gen-z-voters-struggle-signatures-cast-mail-ballot-problems-2024-11?op=1
https://fortune.com/2024/11/07/gen-z-voters-basic-skill-signing-names-vote-counting-chaos-election-official/
Gen Z voters who struggle with cursive could slow the vote count, Nevada's secretary of state said.
He said more mail ballots have been rejected because of issues with young voters' signatures.
Many schools stopped teaching cursive in 2010, leading to a generation unfamiliar with the style.
As more schools stop teaching cursive handwriting, fewer young people have distinct signatures and that could affect Gen Z voters as they try to cast their votes.
He said more mail ballots have been rejected because of issues with young voters' signatures.
Many schools stopped teaching cursive in 2010, leading to a generation unfamiliar with the style.
As more schools stop teaching cursive handwriting, fewer young people have distinct signatures and that could affect Gen Z voters as they try to cast their votes.
Gen Z is also apparently worse at deciphering disinfo :-/.
https://phys.org/news/2023-06-misinformation-susceptibility-online-gen-millennials.html
I am with you. I am also not into generation wars for either direction - this is only interesting as a potential indication of what happens when societies devalue education and invest less and less in it. Especially when such societies are also awash in junk filled social media and other brain rotting stuff. I dont have a point about youth versus wisdom or tech versus Luddites.
My point is that a lot of the content I have seen people devouring is truly this low quality, brain rotting crap. And it is available at your finger tips. These are not quality, useful respectable services bought to you by useful tech often. It is low info, junk food for the brain. Idiocracys ow my balls.
I waste time skimming stuff too. I do not retain much and end up having too many tabs open. But at least the basic material I read is okay. It does bother me that I do not retain much unless I actively exert myself -it is a waste if you dont retain stuff. But it is not low quality material at least.
But the few times people have shown me the stuff they watch on TikTok, I have found it appallingly unwatchable. I dont know how anyone consumes large volumes of that crap. And yet I see people stare at their phones with glazed eyes looking almost zombified.
I do feel tech is making us stupider
That is not a criticism of these young people so much as of the system they are stuck with. My general impression is that we treat educators like crap and so why wouldnt education suffer? And of course that gives the children of wealthier parents advantages that exacerbate inequality.
And I also dont doubt that this constant stimulation media environment is brain rotting. It has definitely made me stupider on the whole . As I said, it is not really good for long term retention, focus etc.
I actually went ahead and invested in a printer a few years ago and have found it worth it..
One of my favorite tech critics has written about it. He articulated the sense I had when I would look at that stuff-a disorienting sense that irrelevant garbage and meaningful info were casually jumbled together:
https://www.roughtype.com/?cat=21
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
69 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
27 years in the university classroom teaching American history. Last spring, I wrote some terms on the chalkboard, I
Comfortably_Numb
Dec 3
#18
After the election a number of stories hit the popular press about signatures and ballot problems.
Irish_Dem
Dec 3
#43
I can read a post way faster than watching a video, and skim read even faster
Bernardo de La Paz
Dec 3
#7
I almost never click a video link that is snuck in following a text headline.
The Unmitigated Gall
Dec 3
#10
What I dislike is the tweet or X thingy that has a link to an article. I wonder why people just
sinkingfeeling
Dec 3
#11
I have nothing against text. I love text. I also appreciate video, which sometimes shows up online
highplainsdem
Dec 3
#14
And I should add, re text vs video, that a lot of times any text about a statement or exchange will leave
highplainsdem
Dec 3
#19
Out of "an abundance of caution" beware: malware can be inserted into a device through text messaging,
ancianita
Dec 3
#21
Same here - I'll generally not watch videos, and am often disappointed that there's no text
bhikkhu
Dec 3
#28
Yeah, I don't care what a dude or gal with a web camera has to say on politics or the economy.
Jacson6
Dec 3
#35
I think I agree. I understand complex issues better if I read them as opposed to hearing someone talk about
LoisB
Dec 3
#38
I agree w/ you. Too many videos, too many going after that 'click count'. I too, like the sound of actual
SWBTATTReg
Dec 3
#51
It seems to me that most videos are talking heads taking 10 minutes to explain 45 seconds of actual news.
Earthrise
Dec 3
#54