Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Editorials & Other Articles

Showing Original Post only (View all)

question everything

(49,223 posts)
Sun Dec 29, 2024, 11:16 PM Dec 29

Why did Bidenomics fail to deliver at the polls? - WaPo [View all]

So many things about the strategy made so much sense. The $1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan at the dawn of Joe Biden’s presidency, which prevented a surge in poverty and joblessness as the covid-19 pandemic ravaged the economy, looked like exactly the right bet — especially given memories of the Obama administration’s timid response to the housing crisis of 2008 and the deep recession that ensued. The burst of industrial policy that followed (the Chips and Science Act, the bipartisan infrastructure law, the Inflation Reduction Act) appeared equally adroit — a strategy to address the plight of the many White workers without a college degree who turned out for Donald Trump in 2016 and, as conventional wisdom would have it, were devastated by the culling of factory jobs.

(snip)

But Dani Rodrik, an economist at Harvard’s Kennedy School, has, to my mind, the most compelling proposition: Bidenomics’ idea of the “working class” is outdated by a few decades.

Manufacturing employs only about 13 million of the nearly 160 million workers toiling outside of farms. Fewer than 1.4 million of those are represented by unions. The industrial policies and the trade barriers, speeches at the picket line and talk of factories returning to left-behind rural areas, were all aimed at a small corner of American society.

“A policy that promises to restore the middle class by bringing manufacturing back is not only unrealistic,” Rodrik wrote for Project Syndicate. “It also rings hollow, because it does not align with workers’ aspirations and everyday experiences.”

There are nearly 16 million workers in retail trade, 17 million in leisure and hospitality, almost 18 million in health care. For sure, they benefited from some of Biden’s policies. But incentives in the Inflation Reduction Act for contractors to work with union labor did nothing for them. So perhaps the lesson for some future Democratic administration hoping to assist the working class is not necessarily that populist policies don’t work. It is that these policies need to be aimed at what America has become, not what it was a bunch of decades ago.

https://wapo.st/4iVc7uU

29 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Uninformed populace doesn't understand 'economics.' elleng Dec 29 #1
No, you do not understand. I had a discussion with another DUer recently raising a similar comments question everything Dec 29 #2
Got it, and my statement stands, maybe should be 'NO ONE' undestands. elleng Dec 29 #4
This. Plus media choosing to focus on Biden's age, gaffes, tulipsandroses Dec 29 #3
Yes! elleng Dec 29 #5
Inflation. Unemployment doesn't count unless doc03 Dec 29 #6
Inflation was in double digits and rising in 1980 Fiendish Thingy Dec 29 #9
People are reminded daily how expensive everything is after the 20% inflation that occurred in 2021-23 MichMan Dec 30 #16
Inflation goes down but prices never go down doc03 Dec 30 #25
That's right, the capitalists find out what the market will be and that's what they charge Walleye Dec 30 #26
Harris didnt actually run on Bidenomics ColinC Dec 29 #7
Likely because the term polled so bad MichMan Dec 30 #15
Regardless, the article says it lost "at the polls" ColinC Dec 30 #18
Pretty hard for the sitting VP to not run on the economy of the administration she is part of. MichMan Dec 30 #20
It isnt if you dont make ads about it or talk about it in your speeches ColinC Dec 30 #24
I think it was lack of advertising. Just my thoughts, no proof. Bang home the good stuff over and over... mitch96 Dec 29 #8
I think the subject line of the OP is a bit limited. Chemical Bill Dec 29 #10
Oh, come on. Stop trying to explain this away. lees1975 Dec 30 #11
To be fair, a big percentage of trump media attention was over rape, fraud, insurrection, lies, obstruction, etc., Silent Type Dec 30 #13
In the, say, 6 months before the election? dpibel Dec 30 #17
Not the media I watch. It was on part of every hour from moment charges or civil suits were filed. Silent Type Dec 30 #19
What charges or civil suits were filed in that time frame? dpibel Dec 30 #21
Puppies and unicorns don't work Historic NY Dec 30 #12
Too many politicians believe the way to reach the working class is at union halls. MichMan Dec 30 #14
I stopped reading at this part: Blue_Tires Dec 30 #22
Bidenomics didn't deliver at the polls because Blue_Tires Dec 30 #23
Yep. All the postmortem analysis I have seen ignores the fact that America won't elect a woman as president Walleye Dec 30 #27
This won't be popular to say here, but trying to coin "Bidenomics" was an awful mistake. bearsfootball516 Dec 30 #28
This is rich . . . Scubamatt Dec 30 #29
Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Why did Bidenomics fail t...