Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OKIsItJustMe

(21,031 posts)
11. Why does it need to be adjudicated?
Sat Dec 28, 2024, 08:49 PM
Dec 28
https://www.citizensforethics.org/news/analysis/legal-experts-across-the-ideological-spectrum-agree-the-14th-amendment-disqualifies-trump-from-holding-office/
August 25, 2023
Legal experts across the ideological spectrum agree: The 14th Amendment disqualifies Trump from holding office

Experts and academics across the ideological spectrum believe that Donald Trump is disqualified under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment of the Constitution. Leading conservative and progressive figures are in agreement that the Constitution bars Trump from assuming office again and must be enforced.

Earlier this month, prominent conservative law professors and Federalist Society members William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen authored a 126-page paper exploring the enforceability of Section 3 of the 14th Amendment in the case of January 6th.

Overall, it seems to us to be quite clear that the specific series of events leading up to and culminating in the January 6, 2021 attack qualifies as an insurrection within the meaning of Section Three: “concerted, forcible resistance to the authority of government to execute the laws in at least some significant respect.”

They explained that as a self-executing provision, Section 3 doesn’t require any action by Congress—and it doesn’t require a criminal conviction.

No action is necessary to “activate” Section Three as a prerequisite to its application as law by bodies or persons whose responsibilities call for its application. The Constitution’s qualification and disqualification rules exist and possess legal force in their own right, which is what makes them applicable and enforceable by a variety of officials in a variety of contexts.


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This is a waste of keystrokes displacedvermoter Dec 26 #1
Not for The Hill. It got them click$$$!!111!!1!!!1 PSPS Dec 26 #3
Can we simply ignore "the supreme Law of the Land" now? OKIsItJustMe Dec 28 #9
No chance. The POS won the election. Unfortunately, democracy doesn't guarantee the best candidates will win. Silent Type Dec 26 #2
Hypothetically, what's to prevent him from being elected a third time? OKIsItJustMe Dec 28 #8
You've answered your own question Fiendish Thingy Dec 28 #16
Here's the scenario I see OKIsItJustMe Dec 29 #17
You're describing a "contingent election", which doesn't apply here. Fiendish Thingy Dec 29 #20
It's guaranteed bloody civil war if we try to remove him. Intractable Dec 26 #4
Not going to happen Fiendish Thingy Dec 26 #5
According to the 14th amendment, it requires a ⅔'s majority of both houses to allow him to serve OKIsItJustMe Dec 28 #7
His disqualification has not been adjudicated Fiendish Thingy Dec 28 #10
Why does it need to be adjudicated? OKIsItJustMe Dec 28 #11
How else would one determine if a person is disqualified from holding office under the 14th? Fiendish Thingy Dec 28 #14
Disqualified: The case for Donald Trump's disqualification under the 14th Amendment OKIsItJustMe Dec 28 #13
So, who decides? Some guy? You? Elon Musk? Fiendish Thingy Dec 28 #15
It's not going to happen, of course, but lees1975 Dec 29 #18
In January of 2021 a bipartisan majority of the House impeached Donald Trump on the grounds that he led an insurrection OKIsItJustMe Dec 29 #19
The opinion of one person on the internet does not equate to the Rule Of Law. Fiendish Thingy Dec 29 #21
U. S. Constitution.net: Trump and the 14th Amendment OKIsItJustMe Dec 28 #6
It no longer matters to Republicans what it right, or being loyal to the Constitution. lees1975 Dec 28 #12
Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Congress has the power to...»Reply #11