Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Editorials & Other Articles
Showing Original Post only (View all)Congress has the power to block Trump from taking office, but lawmakers must act now [View all]
Hat tip, {redacted}
The views expressed by contributors are their own and not the view of The Hill
Congress has the power to block Trump from taking office, but lawmakers must act now
by Evan A. Davis and David M. Schulte, opinion contributors - 12/26/24 8:00 AM ET
The Constitution provides that an oath-breaking insurrectionist is ineligible to be president. This is the plain wording of Section 3 of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution. No person shall hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. This disability can be removed by a two-thirds vote in each House.
Disqualification is based on insurrection against the Constitution and not the government. The evidence of Donald Trumps engaging in such insurrection is overwhelming. The matter has been decided in three separate forums, two of which were fully contested with the active participation of Trumps counsel.
The first fully contested proceeding was Trumps second impeachment trial. On Jan. 13, 2021, then-President Trump was impeached for incitement of insurrection. At the trial in the Senate, seven Republicans joined all Democrats to provide a majority for conviction but failed to reach the two-thirds vote required for removal from office. Inciting insurrection encompasses engaging in insurrection against the Constitution or giving aid and comfort to the enemies thereof, the grounds for disqualification specified in Section 3.
The second contested proceeding was the Colorado five-day judicial due process hearing where the court found by clear and convincing evidence that President Trump engaged in insurrection as those terms are used in Section Three. The Colorado Supreme Court affirmed. On further appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, the court held that states lack power to disqualify candidates for federal office and that federal legislation was required to enforce Section 3. The court did not address the finding that Trump had engaged in insurrection.
{snip}
Evan Davis was editor in chief of the Columbia Law Review and David Schulte was editor in chief of the Yale Law Journal. Both clerked for Justice Potter Stewart. Davis is a New York lawyer who served as president of the New York City Bar, and Schulte is a Chicago investment banker.
The views expressed by contributors are their own and not the view of The Hill
Congress has the power to block Trump from taking office, but lawmakers must act now
by Evan A. Davis and David M. Schulte, opinion contributors - 12/26/24 8:00 AM ET
The Constitution provides that an oath-breaking insurrectionist is ineligible to be president. This is the plain wording of Section 3 of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution. No person shall hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. This disability can be removed by a two-thirds vote in each House.
Disqualification is based on insurrection against the Constitution and not the government. The evidence of Donald Trumps engaging in such insurrection is overwhelming. The matter has been decided in three separate forums, two of which were fully contested with the active participation of Trumps counsel.
The first fully contested proceeding was Trumps second impeachment trial. On Jan. 13, 2021, then-President Trump was impeached for incitement of insurrection. At the trial in the Senate, seven Republicans joined all Democrats to provide a majority for conviction but failed to reach the two-thirds vote required for removal from office. Inciting insurrection encompasses engaging in insurrection against the Constitution or giving aid and comfort to the enemies thereof, the grounds for disqualification specified in Section 3.
The second contested proceeding was the Colorado five-day judicial due process hearing where the court found by clear and convincing evidence that President Trump engaged in insurrection as those terms are used in Section Three. The Colorado Supreme Court affirmed. On further appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, the court held that states lack power to disqualify candidates for federal office and that federal legislation was required to enforce Section 3. The court did not address the finding that Trump had engaged in insurrection.
{snip}
Evan Davis was editor in chief of the Columbia Law Review and David Schulte was editor in chief of the Yale Law Journal. Both clerked for Justice Potter Stewart. Davis is a New York lawyer who served as president of the New York City Bar, and Schulte is a Chicago investment banker.
21 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Congress has the power to block Trump from taking office, but lawmakers must act now [View all]
mahatmakanejeeves
Dec 26
OP
No chance. The POS won the election. Unfortunately, democracy doesn't guarantee the best candidates will win.
Silent Type
Dec 26
#2
According to the 14th amendment, it requires a ⅔'s majority of both houses to allow him to serve
OKIsItJustMe
Dec 28
#7
How else would one determine if a person is disqualified from holding office under the 14th?
Fiendish Thingy
Dec 28
#14
Disqualified: The case for Donald Trump's disqualification under the 14th Amendment
OKIsItJustMe
Dec 28
#13
In January of 2021 a bipartisan majority of the House impeached Donald Trump on the grounds that he led an insurrection
OKIsItJustMe
Dec 29
#19
The opinion of one person on the internet does not equate to the Rule Of Law.
Fiendish Thingy
Dec 29
#21