Latest Breaking News

Think. Again.

(19,517 posts)

54. Yes, and other uses where easily transportable fuel for combustion or on-site electric generation is needed.

Reply to Miguelito Loveless (Reply #51)

Mon Jan 6, 2025, 12:24 AM

Yesterday

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

54 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Biden administration adds exemptions into new climate rules for hydrogen energy [View all] BumRushDaShow Friday OP

By virtue of the second law of thermodyamics, hydrogen is an extremely dirty fuel. NNadir Friday #1

It's also the most abundent element of the universe BumRushDaShow Friday #2

Yes, but on earth it is chemically bound. Looking at it... NNadir Friday #3

Hydrogen is not a "form of energy", it is an energy storage medium... Think. Again. Friday #5

Hydrogen is the most abundant element in the universe GoreWon2000 Friday #8

Yes, we need to make some very big progress building out non-CO2 emitting electrical production. Think. Again. Friday #10

Well... BumRushDaShow Friday #6

Post removed Post removed Friday #9

His background is in chemistry. He's in the pharmaceutical industry. His journal is worth a scroll nmmi Friday #14

As explained in the article... Think. Again. Friday #4

Except when it leaks NickB79 Friday #11

Natural gas leaks are 28X as powerful as CO2.... Think. Again. Friday #12

And hydrogen leaks twice as much as methane, by it's very nature as the smallest element NickB79 Saturday #17

A small mistake you made... Think. Again. Saturday #19

Green hydrogen is the future GoreWon2000 Friday #7

When will the scam that is the "hydrogen economy" Miguelito Loveless Friday #13

If you're Anti-Hydrogen, whatever you do - DO NOT LOOK AT CHINA or India Caribbeans Saturday #15

Simple math Miguelito Loveless Saturday #16

And then fuel cells lose about 40%-60% of the 34kWH in the H2 converting it into electricity? /nt nmmi Saturday #18

Which is still less than the energy lost by our current long distance delivery systems... Think. Again. Saturday #23

59% is losses in the power plant itself in converting the fuel's energy to electricity at the power plant and net of nmmi Saturday #24

Yes, the Hydrogen would not replace batteries... Think. Again. Saturday #25

The problem is Miguelito Loveless Sunday #34

Correct, I personally believe only a Green H2 economy is worthy of pursuing.... Think. Again. Sunday #37

That doesn't alter the fact Miguelito Loveless Sunday #44

Correct, directly powering your home from solar makes the most sense... Think. Again. Sunday #45

To me, marine and flight uses Miguelito Loveless Yesterday #51

Yes, and other uses where easily transportable fuel for combustion or on-site electric generation is needed. Think. Again. Yesterday #54

The environmental impact for lithium-ion Miguelito Loveless Sunday #31

Yes, and H2 can be used when weight and volume are considerations... Think. Again. Sunday #40

So far, Miguelito Loveless Sunday #46

Yes, passenger vehicles are better for batteries... Think. Again. Yesterday #49

My losses are much lower Miguelito Loveless Sunday #29

Yes, no one is suggesting H2 should replace batteries, or any other form of energy storage. Think. Again. Sunday #33

But, in using H2 for power Miguelito Loveless Sunday #39

Yes, and in situations where batteries are not viable due to weight or volume or non-existent power grid lines... Think. Again. Sunday #43

By very expensive tanker trucks Miguelito Loveless Yesterday #50

It doesn't make much sense does it madville Saturday #20

A loss of energy also occurs when it is transferred into batteries... Think. Again. Saturday #22

It must be stored either in liquid form Miguelito Loveless Sunday #28

Hydrogen containment tanks are made of materials that are impervious to embrittlement.... Think. Again. Sunday #32

The tanks are Miguelito Loveless Sunday #36

Yes, they can be. And older existing lines can even be coated to be impervious. Think. Again. Sunday #42

That means digging up old lines and replacing them Miguelito Loveless Yesterday #48

No, if the cost is 2 million, that's what it is, not more. Think. Again. Yesterday #53

The issue is not flammability Miguelito Loveless Sunday #38

Precisely. Miguelito Loveless Sunday #27

Any transfer of energy results in a loss... Think. Again. Saturday #21

True, Miguelito Loveless Sunday #26

Yes, but Lithium is not infinite nor renewable, while Hydrogen basically is.... Think. Again. Sunday #30

Lithium can be recycled from batteries Miguelito Loveless Sunday #35

Yes, with additional energy costs. Think. Again. Sunday #41

The additional energy cost is far lower Miguelito Loveless Yesterday #47

The Hydrogen economy infrastructure would be a cost of doing business.... Think. Again. Yesterday #52