Latest Breaking News

Bernardo de La Paz

(51,506 posts)

10. "In two weeks, right." ? Your post is so terse that it is meaningless. What are you trying to mean?

Sat Jan 4, 2025, 06:09 PM

Saturday

Do you mean give up now?
Do you mean give up in two weeks?
Do you mean start to battle it in two weeks?
Do you mean they will pass it in two weeks of sessions?
Do you mean to be dismissive, which is commonly the take when a sentence is ended with comma "right.". Dismissive of what?
Do you mean to dismiss the significance of this?

I don't see a reference to two weeks in the OP. The House can start work now, not in two weeks which would be Jan. 18, before tRump is inaugurated.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

42 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Johnson tells Republicans Trump wants one big policy bill as party charts course on agenda [View all] LastLiberal in PalmSprings Saturday OP

'Eat this huge shit sandwich!' pfitz59 Saturday #1

A turd this big will gather opposition from all over the sausage factory lefthandedskyhook Sunday #30

This should be fun snowybirdie Saturday #2

You don't get it. LuvLoogie Sunday #37

They will do it. LuvLoogie Saturday #3

In two weeks, right. C_U_L8R Saturday #4

Don't read, VOTE! Red Mountain Saturday #6

Vote! Where? When? For whom? HUAJIAO Saturday #19

"In two weeks, right." ? Your post is so terse that it is meaningless. What are you trying to mean? Bernardo de La Paz Saturday #10

Every big huge plan Trump says he has C_U_L8R Saturday #13

I see. It is a semi-common punchline I've seen but I didn't think of it. Thanks. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Saturday #15

I plan on understanding the tongue-in-cheek comment in two weeks. n/t LastLiberal in PalmSprings Saturday #21

Teeing up failure liberalgunwilltravel Saturday #5

Will need a diversion. multigraincracker Saturday #7

The more they piss off Americans in the next two years will be to our advantage. ( I hope) bluestarone Saturday #8

yup. Let them cook. vota against it but hold them all accountable later ZonkerHarris Saturday #17

Never thought I would see "President Trump" and "big, beautiful package" in the same sentence. Midnight Writer Saturday #9

ROFLOL! LastLiberal in PalmSprings Saturday #22

More like a limp package. Crowman2009 Sunday #36

Sounds like a plan... reACTIONary Saturday #11

I'm with you. JohnnyRingo Sunday #29

Put All Of The Earmarks In One Bill DallasNE Saturday #12

Drown voters with too many things at once & maybe they won't fight back Attilatheblond Saturday #18

In other words... mysuzuki2 Saturday #14

A big shit sandwich in other words Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Saturday #16

"And we're all gonna have to take a bite " Mike 03 Sunday #34

It seems that the we-never-heard-of-Project-2025 is going to try to ram through Project 2025 in reconciliation, perhaps? Hugin Sunday #39

This is not going to go well for Massa Mike. sheshe2 Saturday #20

"...one big, beautiful package"? Trump still thinking of Arnold Palmer! RedWhiteBlueIsRacist Saturday #23

One big bucket of extra awful? Montauk6 Saturday #24

Throw some red meat to the maggots not fooled Sunday #25

Tells me they think they have a clock qazplm135 Sunday #26

He knows that is the only way Figarosmom Sunday #27

Not everyone is going to like parts of that package. JohnnyRingo Sunday #28

"Two measures would become too unruly in the chamber" no_hypocrisy Sunday #31

Well they got the majority, let's see if they can govern. If Emile Sunday #32

Trump and the Heritage Foundation have telegraphed that they Mike 03 Sunday #33

Bills are already written by Heritage and delivered to orange monster. . Hope22 Sunday #40

Rant #2 no_hypocrisy Sunday #35

Democrats should vote lock-step against it until Frank D. Lincoln Sunday #38

Oh? So now the Freedom Caucus likes Omnibus bills that no one has read? Dem4life1970 Sunday #41

One big bill makes sense. JustABozoOnThisBus Yesterday #42