Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
69. And everyone that got tried for it
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 04:10 PM
Aug 2013

Oh wait, after 2002, that seemed to ... not be that important.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This message was self-deleted by its author Harmony Blue Aug 2013 #1
I recommend everyone watch the videos of all the children that died from the chemical attacks Tx4obama Aug 2013 #2
Horrible videos... Agschmid Aug 2013 #3
Then spend the hundreds of millions of dollars this will cost on helping kids in refugee camps Celefin Aug 2013 #10
Did I say bombs? Agschmid Aug 2013 #85
Bombs don't protect people. Vanje Aug 2013 #33
Yep WovenGems Aug 2013 #4
No doubt it's awful. Just Saying Aug 2013 #5
horrifying - and that was nothing compared to what Saddam Hussein did against the Kurds, Shiites and Douglas Carpenter Aug 2013 #7
First of all, Assad is by no means the only party killing children and other civilians cali Aug 2013 #14
Assad is the one using the chemical missiles and the napalm Tx4obama Aug 2013 #19
sorry, that's incorrect. cali Aug 2013 #27
Aren't you precious? Ishoutandscream2 Aug 2013 #70
And be sure.. sendero Aug 2013 #102
+infinity! (nt) LostOne4Ever Aug 2013 #96
Believe it or not, napalm is not considered a chemical weapon. KamaAina Aug 2013 #29
What? Aerows Aug 2013 #54
THEN YOU HAVE NOT BEEN PAYING ATTENTION. AtheistCrusader Aug 2013 #48
We don't know if Assad used them! Fantastic Anarchist Aug 2013 #17
Yes, we do. Go listen to what Kerry just said a bit ago on TV. n/t Tx4obama Aug 2013 #21
LMAO ... Fantastic Anarchist Aug 2013 #24
Kerry is very selective when it comes to chemical weapons. former9thward Aug 2013 #40
Just like we "knew" that Saddam used WMD's after Colin Powell told us he did. n/t totodeinhere Aug 2013 #42
So familiar in the ear... woo me with science Aug 2013 #97
They have high confidence. For what it's worth The_Casual_Observer Aug 2013 #49
That's an actual term with meaning, it is a level below certainty and thus is not certainty Bluenorthwest Aug 2013 #89
Does your reply not eerily remind you of the debate in 2003? Democracyinkind Aug 2013 #101
"We" are not letting "Assad" "kill all the kids." DirkGently Aug 2013 #32
A link below Tx4obama Aug 2013 #37
Wow. Two pages of vague conclusory babble. DirkGently Aug 2013 #39
This is almost as good as the Niger dossier! The_Casual_Observer Aug 2013 #50
They have yellow cake and aluminum tubes! Aerows Aug 2013 #53
And don't forget a pinch of the anthrax in this vile that isn't really anthrax. The_Casual_Observer Aug 2013 #59
And everyone that got tried for it Aerows Aug 2013 #69
Real funny...I'll bet those victims of SARIN or VX are laughing too. jessie04 Aug 2013 #66
It's not funny Aerows Aug 2013 #68
is that really any worse than death by a tomahawk cruise missle? frylock Aug 2013 #88
There have been plenty of campaigns Aerows Aug 2013 #34
And the next time you hear someone screaming in the house down the street, woo me with science Aug 2013 #38
Right, we should only let children be killed with conventional weapons SomethingFishy Aug 2013 #41
Does this indicate that you are now against Pres. Obama's drone program? xocet Aug 2013 #52
Wow. Tx4 you need to explain your various positions on the killing of kids.... Bluenorthwest Aug 2013 #91
The jury is still out on whether Assad ordered these attacks. Maedhros Aug 2013 #55
and I recommend looking back at the photos of the children we killed in Iraq bread_and_roses Aug 2013 #57
Oh lord. The "WON'T SOMEBODY THINK OF THE CHILDREN???" carrot. Still waiting for the stick. TalkingDog Aug 2013 #58
Don't worry... awoke_in_2003 Aug 2013 #99
Your claim is without merit Ocelot Aug 2013 #60
Military PLANES dropped napalm type chemical Tx4obama Aug 2013 #63
Jerusalem Post: "ISRAEL may be behind Syrian chemical weapons use" Ocelot Aug 2013 #93
Totally! We should be ones killing those kids! nt ZombieHorde Aug 2013 #61
Then watch the videos of the rebels eating body parts on YouTube KurtNYC Aug 2013 #72
we'll save kids by killing them? Is that from the Gen. Westmoreland school of childcare? yurbud Aug 2013 #74
Do you buy products made in China? obxhead Aug 2013 #79
The rebels are the ones with the slogan "Christians to Beirut; Alawites to the grave" eridani Aug 2013 #100
Jesus H. Christ you're right, just a few Bombs falling on your country, what could sabrina 1 Aug 2013 #6
Gee, why would you have thought I was kidding? cthulu2016 Aug 2013 #9
of course s/he was kidding. ack. cali Aug 2013 #16
P-E-A-R-L H-A-R-B-0-R Supersedeas Aug 2013 #30
Good lord...bombing isn't war? HooptieWagon Aug 2013 #8
Did you miss the OP's sarcasm or did I miss your sarcasm? Celefin Aug 2013 #13
Evidently I missed OP's sarcasm. Oops. nt HooptieWagon Aug 2013 #20
bombing is "punishment" kentuck Aug 2013 #11
Just a few bombs like Iraq? like Afghan? like Africa? l ladyayache Aug 2013 #12
I was about to go to town on you! Fantastic Anarchist Aug 2013 #15
Sad that we need sarcasm tags these days, isn't it? n/t Hydra Aug 2013 #23
Well, I got it once I read the post. Fantastic Anarchist Aug 2013 #25
Same here. 1-Old-Man Aug 2013 #51
When in doubt, I always check profiles to see if their favorite group is BOG. Divernan Aug 2013 #64
A bombing campaign in someone else's war means you're participating in a war. geek tragedy Aug 2013 #18
Take it to Congress curlyred Aug 2013 #22
Congress is on vacation. They do not want to vote on the Syria issue... Tx4obama Aug 2013 #28
Can't the president call them back? curlyred Aug 2013 #95
sounds familiar..... piratefish08 Aug 2013 #26
It's a fireworks show. backscatter712 Aug 2013 #31
Message auto-removed Name removed Aug 2013 #35
Yah, the US gets bombed all the time and doesn't call it an act of war. They're just being sissies. nilram Aug 2013 #36
K&R DeSwiss Aug 2013 #43
"Humanitarian air strikes." Straight out of Orwell. nt woo me with science Aug 2013 #44
I love it when they claim it's either attack or "do nothing". Spitfire of ATJ Aug 2013 #45
Kerry's warning: we must take action or lose ALL credibility with EVERY OTHER COUNTRY! Divernan Aug 2013 #65
Was he against it before he was for it? Fuddnik Aug 2013 #77
He was for "it"(action), but Obama hadn't yet told him what "it" would be. Divernan Aug 2013 #82
Kerry just shat away any moral capital he had left yurbud Aug 2013 #78
The only war Kerry ever opposed was the one he was in. Bluenorthwest Aug 2013 #90
We are in a race to beat our own bottom to a new even lower level. avaistheone1 Aug 2013 #81
Maybe he should go play "Decision Points" at the Bush Library. Spitfire of ATJ Aug 2013 #94
'Extermination' AtheistCrusader Aug 2013 #46
So what's the difference? Bohemianwriter Aug 2013 #47
"bombing people who cannot bomb you back..." mike_c Aug 2013 #56
Here you go ... blkmusclmachine Aug 2013 #62
I have yet to talk to anyone Democrat or Republican that doc03 Aug 2013 #67
We really need to get into this one. Jackpine Radical Aug 2013 #71
in our name (taxpayer $$$): kpete Aug 2013 #73
Exactly! Great post... Glassunion Aug 2013 #75
Who exactly appointed Obama judge, jury, and executioner? obxhead Aug 2013 #76
Dur DOh We Cant get nuffin right! iamthebandfanman Aug 2013 #80
Word Salad HangOnKids Aug 2013 #92
Are you really so carla Aug 2013 #83
Similar to irregular verbs: truebluegreen Aug 2013 #84
It's actually a 'Kinetic Military Action' Bosonic Aug 2013 #86
Accuracy should always be at the forefront of a debate. Hyperbole need not apply. randome Aug 2013 #87
Fortunately all the people that regularly JoeyT Aug 2013 #98
thanks for that disclaimer - and you are correct - it is often hard to recognize the satire without DrDan Aug 2013 #103
What cracks me up ... sendero Aug 2013 #104
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Jesus H. Crackers! It is ...»Reply #69