Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Hope California redistricting gets similar consideration. Silent Type 21 hrs ago #1
I was afraid of this LetMyPeopleVote 21 hrs ago #2
Well. Then there can be no back-door complaints about California's prop 50. haele 21 hrs ago #3
And will shoot down California's. 50 Shades Of Blue 21 hrs ago #4
Fuck this court! bluestarone 21 hrs ago #5
So much for the "Purcell Principle." WestMichRad 21 hrs ago #6
Given what we saw in Tennessee hurl 21 hrs ago #7
If TX made their new R favored districts Deminpenn 18 hrs ago #14
Of course they did. If we still don't know B.See 21 hrs ago #8
So, the gerrymander war continues with more rigged districts and more voter apathy, and it wont save everyonematters 21 hrs ago #9
Deadline Legal Blog-Supreme Court sides with Texas in challenge to congressional map deemed discriminatory LetMyPeopleVote 21 hrs ago #10
They will shoot down the CA map with the same argument Blaukraut 21 hrs ago #11
At least 3 of the conservatives on the court MUST BE on a list! PuraVidaDreamin 21 hrs ago #12
They're on MY list! I won't say what 'list' that is, Jack Valentino 18 hrs ago #17
Scathing dissent from Justice Kagan: LetMyPeopleVote 19 hrs ago #13
The Trump Supreme Whorehouse doesn't disappoint. dalton99a 18 hrs ago #15
because it failed to honor "the presumption of legislative good faith" by the TEXAS legislature???!!!!!! Jack Valentino 18 hrs ago #16
Here is a good explanation of this decision by Prof. Hasen of the Election Law Blog LetMyPeopleVote 5 hrs ago #18
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Supreme Court allows Texa...»Reply #8