Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

avebury

(11,168 posts)

7. If Barbie wanna be Lawyer only presented the document

Reply to Baitball Blogger (Original post)

Thu Oct 9, 2025, 07:40 PM

Oct 9

with the box checked designating it is for a primary residency then I don't think that they will get a conviction. Listening to Nicole Wallace they were talking about other pages clearly stating that the house was not James' primary residency. James will have a top notch defense team and they need to make sure that the entire loan package is included in the evidence. Many years ago I was a Loan Review Officer so I have reviewed thousands of loan documents and have a pretty good idea of what they will find in the packet. If they strictly restricted what the grand jurors saw that tells me that there is stuff in the packet that have a good chance of blowing up the case for the Prosecutor.

Had I been on the Grand Jury and we could ask questions I would have asked to see the entire loan packet. I would love to be on the jury for the trial.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Baitball Blogger

23 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Anyone want to pitch in on the Leticia James indictment? [View all] Baitball Blogger Oct 9 OP

The Grand Jury only heard one side of the story (Trump's) and it didn't no_hypocrisy Oct 9 #1

I hope Ms. James comes out with her side soon and loud. Baitball Blogger Oct 9 #2

The motivation ForgedCrank Oct 9 #12

What are you talking about? choie Oct 9 #16

An indictment ForgedCrank Oct 9 #18

Right so you think choie Oct 9 #19

You are ForgedCrank Oct 10 #20

I did not know that Grand Juries were presented with anonymous charges. maxsolomon Oct 9 #3

Exactly. Otherwise, you might have jury nullification where the charges no_hypocrisy Oct 9 #5

If I was on the Grand Jury I don't care who the charges are tied to, avebury Oct 9 #9

As I understand it, there were two seperate grand juries GoCubsGo Oct 10 #23

A federal grand jury backed the indictment on Comey as well. W_HAMILTON Oct 9 #4

He wants her to drop his fines and charges. Irish_Dem Oct 9 #6

If Barbie wanna be Lawyer only presented the document avebury Oct 9 #7

The indictment is actually related to a different purchase than the debunked 2023 "primary residence" accusation. pat_k Oct 9 #11

The debunked case was related to a 2023 purchase. This is related to a 2020 purchase. Nevertheless, likely bullshit. pat_k Oct 9 #8

thanks for the actual facts. WarGamer Oct 9 #14

It was fannie mae Oldvet Oct 10 #21

Ms James didn't get to be in her position by being careless of the facts. I actually heard a comment today Deuxcents Oct 9 #10

Yes. I have little doubt the indictment is crap. See background on the charges and speculation in post 8. pat_k Oct 9 #13

Has no legs and hopefully Halligan will soon be disbarred vapor2 Oct 9 #15

grand jury indictments only have as much credibility as the prosecutor who makes the presentation to them bigtree Oct 9 #17

I saw on MSNBC... Chemical Bill Oct 10 #22