Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Prairie Gates

(6,531 posts)

5. The second Bluesky post would have to ask the question of itself as well

Reply to In It to Win It (Original post)

Tue Oct 7, 2025, 03:30 PM

Oct 7

Obviously, there is no contradiction, it's just that people disagree on what is harmful:

Advocates:

GAC: Not harmful
Conversion Therapy: Harmful

Alito:

GAC: Harmful
Conversion Therapy: Not harmful

Neither of these are self-contradictory positions.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

HogCaller98

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

SCOTUS looked likely to strike down Colorado's ban on conversion therapy [View all] In It to Win It Oct 7 OP

There is a reason why it is banned. No hope for the Supreme Court. FloridaBlues Oct 7 #1

They are admitting that psychologists can control your mind and behavior bucolic_frolic Oct 7 #2

It's harmful and inhumane MaineBlueBear Oct 7 #3

How many doctors or scientists on the SC? -misanthroptimist Oct 7 #4

The second Bluesky post would have to ask the question of itself as well Prairie Gates Oct 7 #5

I'm going to post this on most of these threads... hunter Oct 7 #6

states need to take a page out of the right wing anti-abortion laws & make specific laws that are less direct but themaguffin Oct 7 #7