Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Only 16 percent of Americans read for personal interest or pleasure [View all]mnhtnbb
(32,912 posts)125. The rise in popularity of podcasts
might reflect a change in how people absorb writing.
The son I mentioned in my reply, above, #103, who became an avid reader, now writes and produces his own podcast called The Art of Crime. I am a visual learner. I like listening to music, but lose interest in listening to people talk. I'd much rather sit with a book or magazine where I can stop and think about something, than listen to a podcast. In fact, I don't listen to podcasts on any regular basis.
But I wonder if there hasn't been a switch from reading to listening to podcasts for at least some part of the population that were or would have been readers. You can absorb information that might have previously been presented in a book or an article via a podcast.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
152 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Changed my life for the better to embrace and integrate the masculine, feminine, and lupine elements of my nature!
Harker
Oct 1
#65
I definitely do not read that fast, but I do read about 12 to 14 books per year, lots of articles, art books, etc.
Escurumbele
Oct 1
#82
Soon there will be more writers than readers. Not sure who they think will buy their books. ./nt
bucolic_frolic
Oct 1
#2
There is time, people just choose the TV over books now. "Back to School" with Rodney Dangerfield had a
Escurumbele
Oct 1
#87
Yes, and a typical printed news article contains much more information than can be spoken in a radio or TV broadcast
dedl67
Oct 1
#13
Ask your friends, acquaintances, even relatives to read something out loud -- you may be shocked at the result.
eppur_se_muova
Oct 1
#14
True. But all kinds of reading improve the intellect. Studies show that one can increase their IQ by reading alone.
ancianita
Oct 1
#66
Age related farsightedness also caused me to lose the habit of reading books.
Midwestern Democrat
Oct 2
#123
My fourth grade teacher had a program during which, for the last half hour of the school day,
Aristus
Oct 2
#142
I read a lot but in the format of the internet instead of print. & longer pieces as directed to
UTUSN
Oct 1
#22
My goal in retirement is to read all the stuff I never got around to. I will never make it.
Midnight Writer
Oct 1
#24
I completely understood that as a former teacher of reading. But the numbers should be reversed to reflect that reality
ancianita
Oct 1
#50
Cool. Well then, you'd also likely agree that those unable to read for good reasons should not
ancianita
Oct 2
#146
My book club reads a book a month on average. I usually read extra books because a month is too long.
live love laugh
Oct 1
#78
I learned how to read when I was 4. I'm still a heavy reader and I feel sorry fot non readers.
Ping Tung
Oct 1
#84
I feel sorry for the 84% who don't read for pleasure, they don't know what they're missing.
Dave Bowman
Oct 1
#101