Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(28,895 posts)

1. A judge should not release the transcripts

Fri Jul 18, 2025, 08:26 PM

Friday

The reason for the release that the people want to know is not good enough to violate the secrecy of grand jury testimony.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

"Pam Bondi found the loophole she needed." [View all] mahatmakanejeeves Friday OP

A judge should not release the transcripts gab13by13 Friday #1

It's all an empty gesture intended to placate and blame shift... pat_k Friday #5

That's not what he promised............... Lovie777 Friday #2

That won't satisfy the cult. Nt Fiendish Thingy Friday #3

Right. "Loopholes" are notorious term that means, cover-up. Baitball Blogger Friday #7

The loophole is Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6e. rsdsharp Friday #6

The grand jury surrounded Ghislaine, not trump choie Friday #8

Justice Dept. asks court to release Epstein grand jury testimony LetMyPeopleVote Saturday #9

The list without a list lame54 Saturday #10

No one asked for the Grand Jury transcripts LetMyPeopleVote Sunday #11