Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Mike Niendorff

(3,605 posts)
6. Two options here:
Fri Jun 20, 2025, 12:07 AM
Jun 20

First, CA can request a full en banc review -- but it likely would be pointless since this is only a ruling on an initial TRO, which basically only covers the lead-up to trial anyway.

Alternatively, they can just let this ruling be and go back to the trial court for a more substantive result on the merits, which is what I expect they will do.

This isn't the end of the road, it's literally just the beginning.

But that said, it's unfortunate that the appellate panel didn't hold the line on this. The executive branch can't have unchecked authority to effectively rewrite the law by redefining terms on-the-fly to mean whatever they need in order to justify their actions after-the-fact. That's beyond dangerous.


MDN

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Ninth circuit just gave t...»Reply #6