Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Hugin

(36,631 posts)

5. This is one of the most disturbing rulings in my lifetime.

Reply to Eliot Rosewater (Original post)

Fri Jun 20, 2025, 12:05 AM

Jun 20

It goes against my understanding of the structure of the United States, national security, and the prohibitions in and reasoning behind the US Constitution’s explicitly excluding a standing army.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Pachamama Eliot Rosewater

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Ninth circuit just gave the piece of shit what he wanted federalizing the National Guard. [View all] Eliot Rosewater Jun 19 OP

🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬 SheltieLover Jun 19 #1

How soon should I be ready to bug out..? FirstLight Jun 19 #2

Remarkable how bad this is. Wouldn't know it listening to the media. Eliot Rosewater Jun 19 #3

Trump can command National Guard as California's legal challenge moves forward, appeals court says. elleng Jun 19 #4

From Liberal to balance since more... Lovie777 Jun 20 #8

This is one of the most disturbing rulings in my lifetime. Hugin Jun 20 #5

Two options here: Mike Niendorff Jun 20 #6

Thank you for your informed and intelligent response Eliot Rosewater Jun 20 #9

Honestly, I think a Prez has the authority, but not in trumped up situations like this. Silent Type Jun 20 #7