Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: House Democrats fume at David Hogg's plan to oust lawmakers [View all]PurgedVoter
(2,472 posts)62. I suspect David Hogg has good reasons.
There have always been snakes. Kyrsten Sinema, Jill Stein, Joe Lieberman, and Joe Manchin all come to mind as people we should have been campaigning against.
I vote ethics. That makes me a democrat. I don't vote team, I have read George Washington's final address, I know where that leads. Hogg is in a position to see ethics and so far he appears to be strongly ethics based. Carville is DLC and is the first one to jump on the bandwagon to get rid of ethical democratic representatives.
If a democrat got in trouble for saying they were against fascism, Carville would be right there calling for them to apologize and resign.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
71 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Hogg is off on the wrong foot. Replacing Dems with other Dems does not gain us a House majority.
brush
Yesterday
#1
Gaining the majority should be the priority or trump. and the rethugs will keep...
brush
Yesterday
#7
I'm sure that if my representative hadn't passed away last year (Bill Pascrell, Jr.),
no_hypocrisy
Yesterday
#3
It also ignores voters - voters re-elect incumbents because they want the incumbent to continue
emulatorloo
Yesterday
#20
The claim that Hogg is going after Dems who are old just because they are old is bogus.
wnylib
18 hrs ago
#41
Name 1 Democratic House or Senate member who is not 'actively defending Dems and the country'? nt
kelly1mm
14 hrs ago
#63
Isn't it up to voters to decide whether their incumbent representative is "ineffective?"
emulatorloo
Yesterday
#22
The headlines are alarmist and incorrect. I heard Hogg interviewed on NPR and there's nothing in his
wnylib
18 hrs ago
#42
First Bernie in 2016 and now Hogg in 2028...we will never be in power to right the Trump regime wrongs.
Jit423
Yesterday
#12
If it results in replacing a Democrat that has been holding down a seat in Congress
doc03
Yesterday
#13
I'd like to know where and who all these elderly conservative bad Democrats are.
betsuni
Yesterday
#14
The Dems in the Problem Solvers caucus sabotaged Biden's original BBB agenda
Fiendish Thingy
Yesterday
#18
Oh please. Hogg isn't ousting anyone. Elections are to give people choices and the people vote. The
Nanjeanne
Yesterday
#21
If some of those swing district reps want help, perhaps they can get it from the 10s of millions accumulated in
SSJVegeta
19 hrs ago
#27
The plot is that Mike Johnson receives contributions of $10,000 from Lockheed Martin
betsuni
14 hrs ago
#64
Of course they fuming. They had better get off their hands. After what is going on now we need more active people.
Srkdqltr
15 hrs ago
#57
This guy is only 25 years old and shouldn't be in a position to have any real clout in the Democratic Party.
valleyrogue
15 hrs ago
#58