General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Democrat's Response (Connolly) To The NLRB Hacking Is Pathetic [View all]gab13by13
(27,716 posts)that the ranking member could be called the minority chair. I have seen that term used by others.
I resent being accused of misleading people, from now on I will call Connolly the Democratic head of the Oversight committee which is what I wanted to convey.
No member of DU believes that Democrats control the House, that notion is absurd. If Democrats had control of the House then I would have demanded that Connolly immediately subpoena Musk and his cyber-punks to testify before his committee. Connolly doesn't have subpoena power but he can demand that Magats use their subpoena power.
Sorry if I used improper titles, it won't happen again. I still see no harm in calling him the Democratic chair or the minority chair, whatever.
It is just sad to behold SignalGate and NLRBgate are over, done, and I do not subscribe to the notion that because Democrats are in the minority in Congress that their hands are tied. I just hope that what Lisa Murkowski said only applies to Magats.
Even Rachel only talked about NLRBGate for 1 segment of 1 show. I blame her too.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):