Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(62,860 posts)
20. As with the 2017 Muslim ban, he will defy the Constitution and then yield what ground the courts force him to.
Mon Jan 20, 2025, 12:55 PM
Monday

He and his people hope for an end result with constitutional rights substantially pushed back.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

All of this will be litigated for a while newdeal2 Monday #1
His congress will pass whatever he wants. MLAA Monday #2
It's a Constitutional Amendment, so it should require another amendment to reverse. hedda_foil Monday #3
I don't think Jilly_in_VA Monday #23
I hope you're right about that. nt Frank D. Lincoln Monday #27
They wiped out the 14th A before. carpetbagger Monday #29
They can just interpret a phrase or two in a different way. Igel Monday #30
they could mis/reinterpret "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" Orangepeel Monday #35
Ratification requires 3/4 of the states AFTER an wnylib Monday #42
So that means Donnie's anchor babies all have to go, right? Blue_Tires Monday #4
So do naturalized citizens. The 14th Amendment also establishes that they are citizens. rsdsharp Monday #14
And Musk's? how many does he have, a dozen? question everything Monday #19
My parents were not citizens when moonscape Monday #36
Congress can only changebit with an Amendment. Happy Hoosier Monday #5
I would not think so.. because it is in the Constitution.. 14th amendment Peacetrain Monday #6
The RW SCOTUS will try and use this part: Celerity Monday #13
This is exactly what they will use Amishman Monday #25
Congress plus 2/3 of the states dpibel Monday #7
3/4 of the states. cloudbase Monday #11
Thanks dpibel Monday #21
actually the argument isn't that the infants aren't under the jurisdiction but that the parents aren't dsc Monday #16
I thought he needed to push through a constitutional amendment, which Vogon_Glory Monday #8
ACLU, and other will file suits immediately, and it will take years to litigate. But in meantime, trump can say he Silent Type Monday #9
No he can't. It's in the Constitution. Wiz Imp Monday #10
Well, look at some of the fuckheads in Congress now. Initech Monday #12
The only way to end birthright citizenship VMA131Marine Monday #15
Court can just say no retroactivity dpibel Monday #22
Trump wants to deport people already here VMA131Marine Monday #33
ha ha ha. Left up to Congress? Irish_Dem Monday #17
No, and he can't legally do most of what he's proposing. GoCubsGo Monday #18
As with the 2017 Muslim ban, he will defy the Constitution and then yield what ground the courts force him to. Eugene Monday #20
What about Jilly_in_VA Monday #24
Birthright citizenship is in the U.S. constitution GoreWon2000 Monday #26
Anything he wants EarthAbides Monday #28
SCOTUS can ignore the plain language of the Amendment. DemocratSinceBirth Monday #31
Not just the language of the 14A VMA131Marine Monday #34
I don't believe they will but precedent hasn't stopped them in the past. DemocratSinceBirth Monday #37
How do you undo the precedent without VMA131Marine Monday #39
His Executive Order would be proactive, not retroactive. DemocratSinceBirth Monday #40
You are making a big assumption there VMA131Marine Monday #41
If he can't, it will be Obama's or Bidens fault. Win - Win LiberalArkie Monday #32
At this point, I suspect that SCOTUS Bettie Monday #38
The whole idea is to get this into the federal courts. totodeinhere Monday #43
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Can he really end birthri...»Reply #20