Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Think. Again.

(20,971 posts)

8. no, a case like that probably wouldn't make it through the system in only 1 year, 3 months...

Reply to bigtree (Original post)

Thu Jan 16, 2025, 07:55 PM

Jan 16

...especially with trump's known delay tactics.

This should have been started much, much sooner, 2 years were seemingly intentionally wasted by foot-dragging.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

republianmushroom Scrivener7

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Jack Smith brought indictments against Trump August 1, 2023 [View all] bigtree Jan 16 OP

Recommended. H2O Man Jan 16 #1

Correct. Thank you. Oopsie Daisy Jan 16 #2

Recommended. Drum Jan 16 #3

K&R UTUSN Jan 16 #4

Agree. The felon mcar Jan 16 #5

K&R William769 Jan 16 #6

That's a false dichotomy. Even allowing what you state is true, the DOJ is not blameless. harumph Jan 16 #7

what I wrote is in evidence bigtree Jan 16 #9

no, a case like that probably wouldn't make it through the system in only 1 year, 3 months... Think. Again. Jan 16 #8