Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: For any left who still defend Merrick Garland (for unknown reasons) - once the Tangerine pardons all of the J6 losers [View all]Emile
(31,158 posts)34. You left out Hunter Biden's conviction.
Was that deliberately?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
70 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
For any left who still defend Merrick Garland (for unknown reasons) - once the Tangerine pardons all of the J6 losers [View all]
Lemons UK
Monday
OP
What else would you call blaming someone who is not the villain of the story? Nt
Fiendish Thingy
Monday
#24
It's not the Supreme Courts job to enforce the law or seek punishment for those who break the law
Autumn
Monday
#30
The supreme court didn't obstruct Garlands duties. Talk about pretzel. Are you okay?
Autumn
Yesterday
#66
She had nothing to do with immunity. She could have been removed had the trial started earlier.
Autumn
Yesterday
#68
I have heard the judge is in the New York case, is gonna give him an "unconditional discharge"
LeftInTX
Monday
#49
He could have given him a hefty fine, that would be fair. But with a d/c no fine.
LeftInTX
Monday
#55
Hmmmm ... could charges be brought in DC local court ? Unlikely, I know ...
eppur_se_muova
Monday
#17
That is a jurisdiction issue and I'm sorry I don't have information about that.
totodeinhere
Monday
#22
Joe Biden says he made a mistake in choosing Merrick Garland, documented in the Guardian.
Intractable
Monday
#27
If democracy was truly on the line, should Biden have been concerned about publicity?
Kaleva
Monday
#40
Nope, Biden has always been very clear he would not interfere with DOJ business.
Think. Again.
Monday
#44