Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: For any left who still defend Merrick Garland (for unknown reasons) - once the Tangerine pardons all of the J6 losers [View all]unblock
(54,272 posts)16. Any pardon of j6ers would be far worse for the signal it sends
Magats will become even more violent if they feel they have formal approval.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
10 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
70 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
For any left who still defend Merrick Garland (for unknown reasons) - once the Tangerine pardons all of the J6 losers [View all]
Lemons UK
Monday
OP
What else would you call blaming someone who is not the villain of the story? Nt
Fiendish Thingy
Monday
#24
It's not the Supreme Courts job to enforce the law or seek punishment for those who break the law
Autumn
Monday
#30
The supreme court didn't obstruct Garlands duties. Talk about pretzel. Are you okay?
Autumn
Yesterday
#66
She had nothing to do with immunity. She could have been removed had the trial started earlier.
Autumn
Yesterday
#68
I have heard the judge is in the New York case, is gonna give him an "unconditional discharge"
LeftInTX
Monday
#49
He could have given him a hefty fine, that would be fair. But with a d/c no fine.
LeftInTX
Monday
#55
Hmmmm ... could charges be brought in DC local court ? Unlikely, I know ...
eppur_se_muova
Monday
#17
That is a jurisdiction issue and I'm sorry I don't have information about that.
totodeinhere
Monday
#22
Joe Biden says he made a mistake in choosing Merrick Garland, documented in the Guardian.
Intractable
Monday
#27
If democracy was truly on the line, should Biden have been concerned about publicity?
Kaleva
Monday
#40
Nope, Biden has always been very clear he would not interfere with DOJ business.
Think. Again.
Monday
#44