Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

WISH 🙏🏼 Clouds Passing Jan 5 #1
No wish or hope here. Just clearly what is legal. Congress certifying Trump should be considered a major illegal act. ColinC Jan 5 #2
And if it's illegal who's going to hold them accountable? live love laugh Jan 6 #13
If we decide that ultimately the constitution no longer matters ColinC Jan 6 #15
Lawlessness is already happening. There's no accountability. live love laugh Jan 6 #66
The Supreme Court Captain Zero Jan 6 #74
Yes, he should not be certified. Clouds Passing Jan 6 #65
That's a great idea, ForgedCrank Jan 5 #3
"Override the voters?" Like in 2016 and 2000? ColinC Jan 5 #6
They voted for Trump didn't they? nuxvomica Jan 6 #32
More people voted for and wanted someone not drumpf biophile Jan 6 #55
I agree, but it ain't gonna happen. Jeebo Jan 5 #4
Yeah totally. Upholding the rule of law has been a pipe dream for a while now... ColinC Jan 5 #5
Over ride the voters,...hell no.... magicarpet Jan 6 #7
Following the constitution means "overriding the voters" ColinC Jan 6 #8
. magicarpet Jan 6 #9
Has Trump been convicted of insurrection or rebellion? Kaleva Jan 6 #18
If you mean due process, the 5th amendement applies to life liberty and property ColinC Jan 6 #19
Again, isn't a person presumed innocent until found guilty in a court of law? Kaleva Jan 6 #20
Again the stipulation for holding office is clear ColinC Jan 6 #21
Here are your words Kaleva Jan 6 #34
. ColinC Jan 6 #38
So Congress has the authority to decide if he's an insurrectionist or not Kaleva Jan 6 #45
My argument is they need to decide it. ColinC Jan 6 #47
According to the Constitution, Congress has the sole authority to decide if they need to address it or not Kaleva Jan 6 #50
According to the constitution, Congress has the responsibility to decide it. ColinC Jan 6 #53
They won't for the same reason they didn't for Biden Kaleva Jan 6 #57
For instance ColinC Jan 6 #48
Wouldn't that half have to file a petition? Kaleva Jan 6 #59
From your OP Kaleva Jan 6 #60
Representative Democracy requires incumbents to exercise judgment bucolic_frolic Jan 6 #54
Do we really want to be a pure democracy for the next 2-4 years? thatdemguy Jan 6 #64
This is not happening Renew Deal Jan 6 #10
If they do not remove the disability by a 2/3rds vote, it will be an illegal certification. ColinC Jan 6 #11
Technically they are not obligated to Renew Deal Jan 6 #22
Technically they are because the constitution requires them to. ColinC Jan 6 #29
Only if it is determined to be illegal. Renew Deal Jan 6 #37
Not how it works. ColinC Jan 6 #40
And this is why this is fan fiction Renew Deal Jan 6 #51
It's not illegal to have a different opinion than yours. That's why these are called "political questions" tritsofme Jan 6 #39
The words of the constitution are clear. ColinC Jan 6 #41
It is a political question for Congress to decide, disagreeing with you doesn't mean something illegal has happened. tritsofme Jan 6 #43
Disagreement has nothing to do with anything. ColinC Jan 6 #46
The words are clear to you personally. However this is a political, not a legal, determination to be made by Congress. tritsofme Jan 6 #56
For all intents and purposes my use of the word "illegal" is fairly meaningless ColinC Jan 6 #72
It really does FBaggins Jan 6 #68
I surrender!! ColinC Jan 6 #70
The Supreme Court already ruled that Article 3 of the 14th Amendment required Congress to pass summer_in_TX Jan 6 #12
The article i shared explained how the scotus ruling doesnt actually apply to certification ColinC Jan 6 #14
The article is fan fiction Renew Deal Jan 6 #23
It is written by supreme court clerks ColinC Jan 6 #25
And an article written by a supreme court clerk has no legal meaning thatdemguy Jan 6 #67
It's written by two former clerks FBaggins Jan 6 #69
... ColinC Jan 6 #76
Sorry - I had no intent to pile on FBaggins Jan 6 #80
No worries! ColinC Jan 6 #81
Yeah. Morbius Jan 6 #16
Again if congress wants to abide by the constitution and honor the will of the people they can do that ColinC Jan 6 #26
Maybe a snowstorm will do what the Krump army failed to do. usonian Jan 6 #17
🤔 ColinC Jan 6 #27
Is Putin behind this proposal in order to create a civil war? MichMan Jan 6 #24
Putin would love for us to ignore the constitution ColinC Jan 6 #28
I think you know. Morbius Jan 6 #31
The certification is likely going to be unanimous, or close to itactually. ColinC Jan 6 #42
There is no "disability". SCOTUS already killed this idea. Takket Jan 6 #36
Scotus said he can run for office ColinC Jan 6 #49
Yes, and Dems in 2027 should push legislation & let tRump veto it; then push in 2029 and D Pres sign it Bernardo de La Paz Jan 6 #71
LOL! VBNMW Jan 6 #78
Let's storm the capitol and stop the vote! Self Esteem Jan 6 #30
This would fail but they should at least try nuxvomica Jan 6 #33
You should probably set your eyes on something more realistic Takket Jan 6 #35
Pipe dream. MineralMan Jan 6 #44
If this insurrection was done by Democrats, Emile Jan 6 #52
There's still time for him to just fucking die Orrex Jan 6 #58
I guess the term 'domestic enemy' in the oaths of office is just there as fluff. nt Hotler Jan 6 #61
Even if Congress disregarded all of Trump's votes, Harris would not have an electoral vote majority Jose Garcia Jan 6 #62
That part isn't actually true FBaggins Jan 6 #73
Maybe Mother Nature will step in. DFW Jan 6 #63
I'm sure beds were wheeled into the congresscritters offices nitpicked Jan 6 #75
This message was self-deleted by its author WarGamer Jan 6 #77
SAD VBNMW Jan 6 #79
They won't do a damn thing to stop this train to hell Meowmee Jan 7 #82
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Congress can not count Tr...»Reply #44