Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Littlered

(347 posts)

6. I get your opinion but,

Reply to VGNonly (Reply #5)

Sat Jan 4, 2025, 10:20 AM

Jan 2025

Why should I as a taxpayer be on the hook for television studios and other for profit organizations that use their resources? I do believe there should have been a provision for those needing the footage for “court cases.” As I am sure they are exempt for prosecutorial purposes.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

How Ohio police justify charging hundreds of dollars for bodycam video [View all] BlueWaveNeverEnd Jan 2025 OP

Watch out for more of this sort of thing. A LOT more. A HERETIC I AM Jan 2025 #1

I understand it but the went too far to fix the problem Historic NY Jan 2025 #2

Wow. Seizures from sketchy laws are not enough for you greedy cops, eh? OldBaldy1701E Jan 2025 #3

What about the you tubers making big bucks off of camera footage? jimfields33 Jan 2025 #4

You mean the footage created by cameras paid for by us? OldBaldy1701E Jan 2025 #8

Particularly the ones who stage the conflict in the first place FBaggins Jan 2025 #9

The Great Ohio Shakedown Act of 2025 VGNonly Jan 2025 #5

I get your opinion but, Littlered Jan 2025 #6

It's just a joke. VGNonly Jan 2025 #7

There doesn't need to be an exception for court purposes FBaggins Jan 2025 #10

There has to be a middle ground here ecstatic Jan 2025 #11